2019
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1693026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in linguistic cohesion within the first year following right- and left-hemisphere lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants with the mildest impairments received only a few sessions, whereas participants with severe impairments received extended and intensive therapy. Also, most longitudinal studies that did not specifically investigated the effect of therapy have not investigated the effect of treatment on longitudinal changes (e.g., Hillis et al, 2018;Stockbridge et al, 2019). However, there is still a clear need to further investigate the effect of the multiple dimensions of therapy on longitudinal changes in post-stroke aphasia, not only for changes observed in discourse tasks as in the present study, but on all language abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants with the mildest impairments received only a few sessions, whereas participants with severe impairments received extended and intensive therapy. Also, most longitudinal studies that did not specifically investigated the effect of therapy have not investigated the effect of treatment on longitudinal changes (e.g., Hillis et al, 2018;Stockbridge et al, 2019). However, there is still a clear need to further investigate the effect of the multiple dimensions of therapy on longitudinal changes in post-stroke aphasia, not only for changes observed in discourse tasks as in the present study, but on all language abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These results support the fact that the natural recovery of subtle language disruptions following a stroke is important. More recently, changes in the production of cohesive ties in narrative discourse have been investigated in a large group of participants with right (n=76) and left (n=145) hemisphere ischemic stroke at two time points --<1 week and 6-12 months post-stroke (Stockbridge et al, 2021). This study demonstrated that deficits in cohesion occur whether the stroke is located in the right or left hemisphere, and that patterns of cohesive markers are different across the two groups of participants.…”
Section: Longitudinal Discourse Studies In Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although most studies suggest that deficits in cohesion occur when stroke is located in the RH Sherratt & Bryan, 2012;Stockbridge et al, 2019), others have reported cohesion impairments following a stroke in the LH (Andreetta et al, 2012;Barker et al, 2017;Davis et al, 1997;Ellis et al, 2005;Geranmayeh et al, 2017;Marini, 2012;Stockbridge et al, 2019;Uryase et al, 1991). Among the few existing longitudinal studies, Stockbridge et al (2019) reported that total cohesive markers were similarly used between LH and RH individuals in the narrative samples obtained from the analyses of the Cookie theft of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). However, when looking at the acute (< 1 week after stroke) and the chronic (6-12 months after stroke) stages independently, fewer cohesive ties were produced in samples from LH individuals than RH individuals in the acute phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pause lengths were manually extracted from Audacity ® software. Sample lengths refer to the total number of completed words, excluding words filling pauses such as “um” “uh” [34,35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%