1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(77)92068-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in locomotor activity between rats and gerbils in response to novelty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, as has been demonstrated in previous studies, the two tests (Novel Environment and Novel Object Tests) may have induced different levels of fear yielding different behavioural responses. Previous studies have emphasized the important role of refuge access in rodents in the novel environment test: rats quickly entered a small darkened box [36] , [37] or did not even leave the refuge when provided with a start box [38] , [39] , and when given a choice between entering a novel area or a home cage, the rats chose the home cage more frequently, even when having to confront a foot shock to do so [38] . In mice, behavioural responses were reflected in the plasma corticosterone levels that increased when the animals were placed in a novel environment without escape option, but remained unchanged when the animals were presented with a novel object in a familiar environment [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, as has been demonstrated in previous studies, the two tests (Novel Environment and Novel Object Tests) may have induced different levels of fear yielding different behavioural responses. Previous studies have emphasized the important role of refuge access in rodents in the novel environment test: rats quickly entered a small darkened box [36] , [37] or did not even leave the refuge when provided with a start box [38] , [39] , and when given a choice between entering a novel area or a home cage, the rats chose the home cage more frequently, even when having to confront a foot shock to do so [38] . In mice, behavioural responses were reflected in the plasma corticosterone levels that increased when the animals were placed in a novel environment without escape option, but remained unchanged when the animals were presented with a novel object in a familiar environment [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is controverse with regard to the interpretation of single behavioral parameters, such as those that can be measured in behavioral tests such as the open field, in the context of emotionality. Common assumptions are that (1) emotionality (fear) and exploration are inversely related, i.e., high levels of fear inhibit exploration; (2) high and low anxiety levels suppress exploration and intermediate fear levels increase exploration (Archer, 1973;Candland & Nagy, 1969;Russell, 1973); and (3) reduced emotionality is expressed by decreased running and rearing activities (Denenberg, 1969;Escorihuela, Fernandez-Teruel, Gil, Aguilar, Tobena, & Driscoll, 1999;Liebsch, Montkowski, Holsboer, & Landgraf, 1998;Osborne, 1977). Stereotyped distress vocalizations emitted by young animals of a variety of species during situations of maternal separation and social isolation is considered as a reliable parameter, which shows a strong positive correlation with anxiety levels (Hofer, Masmela, Brunelli, & Shair, 1999;Panksepp, Herman, Conner, Bishop, & Scott, 1978).…”
Section: Discussion Open Field Behaviors As Measurements For Emotionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mongolian gerbils are curious rodents which show a high level of exploratory behavior in the open-field situation. A number of studies have shown that exploratory behavior increases as novelty of the situation increases (Osborne, 1977). Wilz and Bolton (1971) found that when familiar stimuli in an open field were rearranged, gerbils significantly increased their exploratory behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%