2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in male Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus hearing systems facilitate recognition of conspecific female flight tones

YuMin M. Loh,
Yifeng Y.J. Xu,
Tai-Ting Lee
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, male (but not female) mosquitoes can demonstrate large amplitude, seemingly mono-frequent flagellar oscillations referred to as self-sustained oscillations (SSOs). SSOs entrain only to pure tones close to female WBFs 9 , suggesting that SSOs in males play a key role in the acoustic processing of female flight tones.Investigating this acoustic processing is made more complicated by differences in the peak sensitivity of electrical responses recorded from the axon bundle of male JO neurons (referred to as electrical tuning) to the aforementioned mechanical tuning of the flagellum 32,33 . This mismatch has led researchers to suggest that male JO neurons respond most sensitively not to female flight tones, but to non-linear phantom tones resulting from interactions between male and female WBFs, referred to as distortion products (DPs) 9,22,27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, male (but not female) mosquitoes can demonstrate large amplitude, seemingly mono-frequent flagellar oscillations referred to as self-sustained oscillations (SSOs). SSOs entrain only to pure tones close to female WBFs 9 , suggesting that SSOs in males play a key role in the acoustic processing of female flight tones.Investigating this acoustic processing is made more complicated by differences in the peak sensitivity of electrical responses recorded from the axon bundle of male JO neurons (referred to as electrical tuning) to the aforementioned mechanical tuning of the flagellum 32,33 . This mismatch has led researchers to suggest that male JO neurons respond most sensitively not to female flight tones, but to non-linear phantom tones resulting from interactions between male and female WBFs, referred to as distortion products (DPs) 9,22,27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating this acoustic processing is made more complicated by differences in the peak sensitivity of electrical responses recorded from the axon bundle of male JO neurons (referred to as electrical tuning) to the aforementioned mechanical tuning of the flagellum 32,33 . This mismatch has led researchers to suggest that male JO neurons respond most sensitively not to female flight tones, but to non-linear phantom tones resulting from interactions between male and female WBFs, referred to as distortion products (DPs) 9,22,27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%