2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in muscle coactivation during postural control between healthy older and young adults

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to clarify the difference in muscle coactivation during postural control between older and young adults and to identify the characteristics of postural control strategies in older adults by investigating the relationship between muscle coactivation and postural control ability. Forty-six healthy older adults (82.0±7.5 years) and 34 healthy young adults (22.1±2.3 years) participated. The postural tasks selected consisted of static standing, functional reach, functional stability bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
124
4
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
124
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed by Melzer, Benjuya, and Kaplanski (2001), in which older adults adopted a more rigid postural strategy through cocontraction around the ankle joint that was used in maintaining balance in a narrow stance with the addition of a cognitive task. Several other studies corroborated such findings, demonstrating an increase in muscle coactivation in the elderly compared with young adults while controlling posture (Nagai et al, 2011;Woollacott & Shumway-Cook, 1990). The reason for the adoption of such a strategy by older adults could be attributed to a number of factors, including deficits acquired during the aging process in the sensory system, motor system, and/or sensorimotor integration processing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar results were observed by Melzer, Benjuya, and Kaplanski (2001), in which older adults adopted a more rigid postural strategy through cocontraction around the ankle joint that was used in maintaining balance in a narrow stance with the addition of a cognitive task. Several other studies corroborated such findings, demonstrating an increase in muscle coactivation in the elderly compared with young adults while controlling posture (Nagai et al, 2011;Woollacott & Shumway-Cook, 1990). The reason for the adoption of such a strategy by older adults could be attributed to a number of factors, including deficits acquired during the aging process in the sensory system, motor system, and/or sensorimotor integration processing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, it seems that in order to maintain the vertical head-trunk orientation during the unpredictable perturbation, older adults initially employed a more conservative strategy of increasing the trunk stiffness. Similar strategies of increasing joint stiffness with co-activation of trunk and thigh muscles in response to a perturbation have been previously reported in healthy young and old individuals (Allum et al 1989;Berger et al 1992;Nagai et al 2011) and in individuals with Parkinson's disease (Dimitrova et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although coactivation was not a primary outcome measure in this investigation, we assume that the constantly elevated muscle amplitudes of TIB in seniors during SLEO led to enhanced coactivation of the ankle muscles [37]. Coactivation has been shown to be associated with increased postural sway during standing balance tasks [38]. In this regard, an increased coactivation would stiffen the joint in order to reduce destabilization effects and thus reflect a more inefficient neuromuscular strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%