2021
DOI: 10.3390/plants10061161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Nectar Traits between Ornithophilous and Entomophilous Plants on Mount Cameroon

Abstract: Despite a growing number of studies, the role of pollinators as a selection agent for nectar traits remains unclear. Moreover, the lack of data from some biogeographic regions prohibits us from determining their general importance and global patterns. We analyzed nectar carbohydrate traits and determined the main pollinators of 66 plant species in the tropical forests of Mount Cameroon (tropical West Africa). The measured nectar traits included total sugar amounts and proportions of sucrose and hexoses (i.e., … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T A B L E 1 Floral traits' importance (expressed as the Mean Decrease in Accuracy), sensitivity and specificity for individual primary pollinator groups and for the whole RF models with the three most important traits plants during the wet season (Janeček et al, 2015) whilst being more generalised during the dry season (Janeček, Chmel, Ewome, et al, 2021). Additionally, the seemingly low predictability of our models for some primary pollinators could also be related to the complexity of plantpollinator interactions, whilst our analyses focused on a few selected floral traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T A B L E 1 Floral traits' importance (expressed as the Mean Decrease in Accuracy), sensitivity and specificity for individual primary pollinator groups and for the whole RF models with the three most important traits plants during the wet season (Janeček et al, 2015) whilst being more generalised during the dry season (Janeček, Chmel, Ewome, et al, 2021). Additionally, the seemingly low predictability of our models for some primary pollinators could also be related to the complexity of plantpollinator interactions, whilst our analyses focused on a few selected floral traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was converted to the amount of sugar per flower by multiplying it with the measured volume in capillary tubes. For low‐nectar producing flowers, we washed the flowers using a Hamilton syringe with filtered water, added ethanol to the samples and boiled it for 15 min to deactivate enzymes (Chlumská et al, 2014; Janeček, Chmel, Ewome, et al, 2021). The nectar samples were dried in the laboratory, where they were transferred into constant volumes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured ten floral traits (Table S2; partly used in Klomberg et al ., 2022). Three of these were morphometric (corolla size, and the length and width of nectar tube), and seven were qualitative characterising floral shape (bell, bowl, dish, funnel, gullet, labiate, open, papilionaceous, salverform, stellate, trumpet, tube, urceolate), symmetry (zygo- and actinomorphy), orientation (horizontal, pendant, upright), colour (brown, green, orange, pink, purple, red, white, yellow), nectar guides (presence/absence), brightness (vivid/drab), and odour strength (none, weak, strong), and amount of nectar sugar (measured as 24-hour production in flowers in-situ, as described in (Janeček et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, nectar robbing was more frequent in the wet season, where flowers with longer nectar tubes and generally narrower corollas were more common (Fig 2A). Such flowers were prevalent in the wet season, where their morphology could help avoid nectar dilution (Aizen, 2003) or specialise to their pollinators with higher energetic needs (Chmel et al, 2021). However, such specialised flowers are more often robbed by small-tongued visitors unable to reach their nectar through the flower opening (Bronstein, 2001;Navarro & Medel, 2009;Maruyama et al, 2015).…”
Section: Variation In Cheating Frequencies Across Space and Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation