2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.4.3.031209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in orientation tuning between pinwheel and domain neurons in primary visual cortex depend on contrast and size

Abstract: , "Differences in orientation tuning between pinwheel and domain neurons in primary visual cortex depend on contrast and size," Neurophoton. 4(3), 031209 (2017), doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.4.3.031209. Abstract. Intrinsic signal optical imaging reveals a highly modular map of orientation preference in the primary visual cortex (V1) of several species. This orientation map is characterized by domains and pinwheels where local circuitry is either more or less orientation selective, respectively. It has now been repeatedl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(123 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For orientation, the tuning width (HWHH) of the preferred orientation is more than twice as sharp in the control example (24.3º vs 48.9º;Fig 4A,B), and this difference is also seen for the population (Control: 27.7º ± 2.4, compared to 47.9º ± 4.4 in CCI injured animals; P = 0.0009;Fig 4C). Broader tuning after TBI is consistent with orientation tuning mediated more through feedforward mechanisms and impairments in cortical inhibition(Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2017). Similarly, the larger size preference in TBI compared to control neuron examples (73º vs. 35º;Fig 4D,E)and populations (52 ± 5 º, compared to 32 ± 3 º; P = 0.005;Fig 4F)also indicates a loss of cortical inhibition(Liu et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For orientation, the tuning width (HWHH) of the preferred orientation is more than twice as sharp in the control example (24.3º vs 48.9º;Fig 4A,B), and this difference is also seen for the population (Control: 27.7º ± 2.4, compared to 47.9º ± 4.4 in CCI injured animals; P = 0.0009;Fig 4C). Broader tuning after TBI is consistent with orientation tuning mediated more through feedforward mechanisms and impairments in cortical inhibition(Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2017). Similarly, the larger size preference in TBI compared to control neuron examples (73º vs. 35º;Fig 4D,E)and populations (52 ± 5 º, compared to 32 ± 3 º; P = 0.005;Fig 4F)also indicates a loss of cortical inhibition(Liu et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…al., 2011; Liu et al,2015;Liu et al, 2017). For orientation, the tuning width (HWHH) of the preferred orientation is more than twice as sharp in the control example (24.3º vs 48.9º;Fig 4A,B), and this difference is also seen for the population (Control: 27.7º ± 2.4, compared to 47.9º ± 4.4 in CCI injured animals; P = 0.0009;Fig 4C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%