2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05904-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in perceived durations between plausible biological and non-biological stimuli

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test this hypothesis, different stimuli could be used to induce the temporal illusion. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that static images (Nather & Bueno, 2012) or pendular motion (Giorjiani et al, 2021;Karşılar et al, 2018) can induce temporal distortions. In this case, the position of the stimulus (e.g., a human silhouette running in place) at the end of the interval is not likely to bias responses on a rating scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this hypothesis, different stimuli could be used to induce the temporal illusion. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that static images (Nather & Bueno, 2012) or pendular motion (Giorjiani et al, 2021;Karşılar et al, 2018) can induce temporal distortions. In this case, the position of the stimulus (e.g., a human silhouette running in place) at the end of the interval is not likely to bias responses on a rating scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%