2022
DOI: 10.1177/12034754221119500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Practice Patterns and Payments for Female and Male Dermatologists: A Canadian Population-Based Study Over 3 Decades

Abstract: Background Canada’s fee-for-service physician reimbursement system, where a set rate is provided for each service, suggests that a physician sex pay gap should not exist. However, recent evidence has questioned this presumption. Objectives To characterize trends in demographics and billing, overall and by sex, for dermatologists compared to other medical and surgical specialty groups in Ontario, Canada. Methods Using population-based data, analysis of physician billing and clinical activity from Ontario, Canad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the annual increase in the proportion of female doctors in Japan (Japanese Ministry of Health Law 2020). Notably, this phenomenon has been observed not only in Japan but also in the U.S. and Canada (Buys 2014;Georgakopoulos et al 2022). Under these circumstances, the examination of factors not directly related to medicine, such as gender differences in physicians, may provide a reference for future measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with the annual increase in the proportion of female doctors in Japan (Japanese Ministry of Health Law 2020). Notably, this phenomenon has been observed not only in Japan but also in the U.S. and Canada (Buys 2014;Georgakopoulos et al 2022). Under these circumstances, the examination of factors not directly related to medicine, such as gender differences in physicians, may provide a reference for future measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%