2010
DOI: 10.1002/jls.20137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in principals' leadership behavior in high‐ and low‐performing schools

Abstract: Survey and focused on a comparison of teachers' perceptions of how school principals exercise their role in both high-and low-performing elementary and middle schools that serve high-poverty student populations. Teachers in the high-performing schools consistently viewed their principals' behavior more positively than did their counterparts in the lower-performing schools. Teachers reported less difference in regard to engaging the community to create shared responsibility for student and school success. Very … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with Noman et al (2018), strong interpersonal skills, people-centered leadership, clear communication of vision and goal, and creating a positive work environment are all vital constituents of successful leadership in school. As reported by Lindahl (2010), teachers in high-rated schools viewed their principals' behavior more positively than did their counterparts in the lower rated schools. Thus, it seems a positive school environment leads to teachers' higher selfefficacy, collective efficacy, and job satisfaction, which are instrumental to improving teaching and learning (Leithwood et al, 2008).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Consistent with Noman et al (2018), strong interpersonal skills, people-centered leadership, clear communication of vision and goal, and creating a positive work environment are all vital constituents of successful leadership in school. As reported by Lindahl (2010), teachers in high-rated schools viewed their principals' behavior more positively than did their counterparts in the lower rated schools. Thus, it seems a positive school environment leads to teachers' higher selfefficacy, collective efficacy, and job satisfaction, which are instrumental to improving teaching and learning (Leithwood et al, 2008).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…There is increasing evidence that leadership makes a difference in schools (e.g. Hallinger & Heck, 1996;Lindahl, 2010;Louis et al, 2010, Osiname, 2018. Scholars have made sustained contributions to the question of how the behaviors of school leaders contribute to student achievement?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The school administrator is the pivotal element within the school who affects the quality of teacher instruction (Lindahl, 2010) and the height of students' achievement. The school needs the instructional management leadership of the school administrator to keep focus on the activities that paved the way for high student achievement.…”
Section: Improving Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%