2020
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in rates of percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac surgery and all-cause mortality in indigenous and non-indigenous Australians with suspected acute coronary events

Abstract: Background Indigenous populations globally are known to have lower revascularisation rates following acute coronary events and higher mortality partly due to inequitable access to specialised care like cardiac catheterisation. Whether these disparities persist when access is readily available is unclear. Purpose We compared the rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardiac surgery, 30-day and long-term all-cause … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study was to compare the patient characteristics, presentations, and outcomes of indigenous and non-indigenous Australians undergoing PCI in metropolitan and larger regional centers in Victoria, Australia. Victoria is a state in the southeast of the nation with a population of about 6.4 million people, or 7.2% of Australia's indigenous population [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of this study was to compare the patient characteristics, presentations, and outcomes of indigenous and non-indigenous Australians undergoing PCI in metropolitan and larger regional centers in Victoria, Australia. Victoria is a state in the southeast of the nation with a population of about 6.4 million people, or 7.2% of Australia's indigenous population [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to compare the patient characteristics, presentations, and outcomes of indigenous and non-indigenous Australians undergoing PCI in metropolitan and larger regional centers in Victoria, Australia. Victoria is a state in the southeast of the nation with a population of about 6.4 million people, or 7.2% of Australia's indigenous population [ 8 ]. There is a notable dearth of thorough data comparing the results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Australia, despite the significant burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among indigenous Australians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%