2015
DOI: 10.1387/revpsicodidact.13832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Reading Self-Efficacy between School Years and according to Gender // Diferencias en la auto-eficacia lectora entre cursos en la escolaridad y en función del género

Abstract: Differences in reading self-efficacy between school years and as a function of gender were studied in a sample of 1,060 Spanish students from the third year of primary education up to the fourth year of compulsory secondary education (equating to Years Four to Eleven in the British system). A scale for reading self-efficacy was used that differentiated three dimensions according to the level of complexity of the reading skills involved in a reading comprehension task. It distinguished between decoding skills, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The students reading self-efficacy was found at the moderate level. The students' reading self-efficacy are categorized at a moderate level because they were not very much confident in all the three reading self-efficacy indicators theorized by Olivares, Fidalgo, & Torrance, (2016) The students' reading self-efficacy is firstly due to their self confidence in figuring out the main ideas of both the descriptive and recount texts. Secondly, the students' reading self-efficacy is due to their ability to contextualize the specific ideas of both the descriptive and recount texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The students reading self-efficacy was found at the moderate level. The students' reading self-efficacy are categorized at a moderate level because they were not very much confident in all the three reading self-efficacy indicators theorized by Olivares, Fidalgo, & Torrance, (2016) The students' reading self-efficacy is firstly due to their self confidence in figuring out the main ideas of both the descriptive and recount texts. Secondly, the students' reading self-efficacy is due to their ability to contextualize the specific ideas of both the descriptive and recount texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the positive and significant correlations between reading interest and reading self-efficacy, reading interest and reading competency, reading self-efficacy and reading competency could be speculated as follows. Previous research show that reading interest and reading self-efficacy is related positively because when the students do have 1) pleasure describes a feeling of enjoyment in determining the main ideas of descriptive and recount texts, 2) focusing attention describes a feeling of interest to concentrate in determining the specific ideas of descriptive and recount texts, 3) time use describes an interest of involvement in determining the textual references in descriptive and recount texts, 4) motivation describes interest to motivated in understanding the word meanings in descriptive and recount texts, 5) emotional describes a feeling of excitement in determining the main ideas of descriptive and recount texts, and 6) effort describes a power of interest to find complex specific ideas of descriptive and recount texts (Crow and Crow, 1956), they will have positively high confident in 1) determining the main ideas of descriptive and recount texts, 2) determining the specific ideas of descriptive and recount texts, and 3) discovering relevant textual references in descriptive and recount texts (Olivares et al, 2016) Third, the relationships among the two predictor variables that are reading interest and reading selfefficacy and one the criterion variable that is reading competency were supported by previous studies. Conway, (2017) investigated the relationship between self-efficacy or not in high school students and their reading comprehension scores at Smith High School.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La autoeficacia lectora fue evaluada a partir de la Escala de Autoeficacia Lectora de Olivares et al (2016), que diferencia tres dimensiones de la autoeficacia teniendo en cuenta los niveles de procesamiento semántico propuestos por Kintsch (Kintsch y Rawson, 2005). La primera dimensión, autoeficacia decodificación, evalúa las creencias de autoeficacia sobre las habilidades de decodificación y fluidez lectora (3 ítems).…”
Section: Evaluación De La Autoeficacia Lectoraunclassified
“…Una explicación a estos bajos resultados en el rendimiento lector del alumnado español podría encontrarse en un descenso de la motivación y la confianza en su capacidad para utilizar estrategias de autorregulación (Tonks y Taboada, 2011;Vandevelde et al, 2013). Pues la investigación ha mostrado que en el periodo de transición a la educación secundaria muchos estudiantes desarrollan creencias motivacionales negativas sobre su capacidad para resolver las tareas con éxito, manifestando una disminución de las creencias de autoeficacia lectora (Olivares et al, 2016;Usher y Pajares, 2008) y mayor dificultad para autorregular su aprendizaje.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Existe una serie de estudios y trabajos que niega la existencia de diferencias en función del sexo en comprensión lectora, tanto en Educación Primaria (Blázquez-Garcés et al, 2015), como en Educación Secundaria y pre-universitaria (Koban, 2016;Yazdanpanah, 2007). También se ha descrito que la percepción de la auto-eficacia lectora en Educación Primaria no depende del sexo (Olivares, Fidalgo y Torrance, 2016). Por otra parte, hay trabajos que refieren ventajas por parte de los alumnos, en comparación con las alumnas, en comprensión oral (Velarde, Canales y Meléndez, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified