2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:rihe.0000010047.46814.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Self-Regulation for Online Learning Between First- and Second-Generation College Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, self-regulated students also keep their motivation up to par (Pintrich 2000;Winne and Hadwin 1998;Zimmerman 2002). While students in traditional education also need to engage in these activities, they are more important in MOOCs as they encompass greater student autonomy (Garrison 2003).The openness in time and place makes students solely responsible for their time and environment management (Williams and Hellman 2004). Furthermore, students often do not have regular contact with fellow students in a MOOC; work is in most cases done individually (Toven-Lindsey et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, self-regulated students also keep their motivation up to par (Pintrich 2000;Winne and Hadwin 1998;Zimmerman 2002). While students in traditional education also need to engage in these activities, they are more important in MOOCs as they encompass greater student autonomy (Garrison 2003).The openness in time and place makes students solely responsible for their time and environment management (Williams and Hellman 2004). Furthermore, students often do not have regular contact with fellow students in a MOOC; work is in most cases done individually (Toven-Lindsey et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mención especial en esta categoría tienen aquellos trabajos que se centran en el desarrollo o influencia de las habilidades de autorregulación del aprendizaje como condición necesaria para el logro de aprendizaje en intervenciones educativas virtuales (DeTure, 2004;Williams y Hellman, 2004). Al respecto, nuestro grupo ha mostrado, en la realización de dos tesis doctorales, algunos avances muy interesantes sobre la posibilidad de incrementar los niveles de autorregulación del aprendizaje en la educación básica secundaria a través de andamiajes actuando sobre ambientes hipermediales (López, 2010;López y Hederich, 2010;López, Hederich y Camargo, 2011), o bien a través del aporte de información estilística al estudiante en ambientes virtuales llevados a cabo en la educación superior (Pinzón, 2011).…”
Section: Hacia Una Prospectiva De La Investigación En Estilística Eduunclassified
“…Research on promoting self-regulation online has been conducted during the last decade. Williams and Hellman (2004) assert that extending research on self-regulation into the area of online learning is reasonable and that online instruction allows more learner choice. Zimmerman (2008, p. 172) notes that hypermedia learning environments have great potential for improving learning, but they require personal initiative and skill.…”
Section: The Quest For Mastering One's Own Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility to choose poses a dropout risk and a positive challenge for students. According to Williams and Hellman (2004), asynchronous online instruction allows choices that traditional instruction does not offer. This is an important reason for why learning self-regulation can be critical to academic success in online courses (Williams & Hellman, 2004, p. 73-74).…”
Section: The Rationale Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%