2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in sensory processing of German vowels and physically matched non-speech sounds as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the human event-related brain potential (ERP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach of studying auditory perception using vowel stimuli is, however, not limited to vowels that are embedded in CVC syllables: Several studies used single vowels. These studies investigated speech perception in adults with dyslexia (Vandermosten et al, 2010) and children with dyslexia (Vandermosten et al, 2011) or automatic sensory processing of speech stimuli as indexed by the mismatch negativity with healthy adults (see, e.g., Christmann, Berti, Steinbrink, & Lachmann, 2014;Näätänen et al, 1997) and children with dyslexia (Bruder et al, 2011;Corbera, Escera, & Artigas, 2006;Csépe, Gyurkocza, & Osman-Sagi, 1998). In the present study, isolated vowels were used as well, as is explained in further detail in the Materials and Method section.…”
Section: German Vowel Length Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of studying auditory perception using vowel stimuli is, however, not limited to vowels that are embedded in CVC syllables: Several studies used single vowels. These studies investigated speech perception in adults with dyslexia (Vandermosten et al, 2010) and children with dyslexia (Vandermosten et al, 2011) or automatic sensory processing of speech stimuli as indexed by the mismatch negativity with healthy adults (see, e.g., Christmann, Berti, Steinbrink, & Lachmann, 2014;Näätänen et al, 1997) and children with dyslexia (Bruder et al, 2011;Corbera, Escera, & Artigas, 2006;Csépe, Gyurkocza, & Osman-Sagi, 1998). In the present study, isolated vowels were used as well, as is explained in further detail in the Materials and Method section.…”
Section: German Vowel Length Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is this difference in the results then a consequence of the different nature of the stimuli, that is, an instrumental vs. a language-related stimulus? A number of studies indicate that vocal sounds are processed differently in the brain:Perrodin, Kayser, Logothetis, and Petkov (2011), for example, found voice cells in the temporal lobes of primates;Vouloumanos and Werker (2007) demonstrated that human newborns recognize speech contrasted with non-speech analogues;Christmann, Berti, Steinbrink and Lachmann (2014) recently showed different…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). The resulting stimuli show exactly the same range of frequencies and complexity as the unfiltered tones (see also [17,21]). The overtone series is eliminated by the rotation as the fundamental frequency is changed, therefore, the spectrally rotated sounds are perceived as noise-like.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Comparable to prior research, 2000 Hz was chosen as center frequency for the rotation, this means that all frequencies are mirrored at this frequency. In order to maintain the perceived naturalness of the tones, which could be affected by the usage of the low pass filter (for more details see [16,17,20]), we modified the procedure to create spectrally rotated stimuli with a complete spectrum. This was achieved by adding all frequencies above 4000 Hz of the tone to the spectrally rotated stimulus with Audition (Version: CS5.5, Adobe, Munich, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation