2021
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in sleep timing and related effects between African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This direction of effect has been reported before. In a study with 578 African American and 823 white individuals, actigraphic mean weekday midsleep time was 27 minutes later in African Americans than in whites ( p = .02), and weekend midsleep time was 20 minutes later ( p = .03) [ 61 ]. That study had a mean age of 68, and also discusses the possibility of older age accounting for the difference in results from prior studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This direction of effect has been reported before. In a study with 578 African American and 823 white individuals, actigraphic mean weekday midsleep time was 27 minutes later in African Americans than in whites ( p = .02), and weekend midsleep time was 20 minutes later ( p = .03) [ 61 ]. That study had a mean age of 68, and also discusses the possibility of older age accounting for the difference in results from prior studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reported typical total sleep time was not different by race in our study, the shift of sleep to a later clock time in non-White participants could compromise optimal function. Such delayed sleep phase has been associated with depression in some populations (Combs et al, 2021). Our data was collected by self-report; future work to confirm this finding would benefit from more objective actigraph data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that chronotype and early rise profile, although likely correlated, represent two distinct measures that may be influenced by different internal and external factors. Racial/ethnic differences reported in earlier studies were almost exclusively made on the Black-White comparisons, and the results were mixed, with several studies reporting an earlier chronotype among Blacks [38][39][40], while others reporting no racial difference [15,41]Hardly any research reported chronotype or rest-activity timing among Hispanic and Asian populations. We filled the knowledge gap by using a diverse sample representing the US population, and reported that except for Mexican Americans, all other non-White racial/ethnic groups exhibited a lower eigenvalue for the early rise profile, a novel finding that needs to be confirmed by future research.…”
Section: The Early Rise Profilementioning
confidence: 90%