2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr02419a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in SMA-like polymer architecture dictate the conformational changes exhibited by the membrane protein rhodopsin encapsulated in lipid nano-particles

Abstract: Using the GPCR rhodopsin as an exemplar, SMA SMI and DIBMA constitute a ‘tool-kit’ of structurally-related solubilising polymers, with each providing different advantages for studying membrane proteins encapsulated in lipid particles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although beyond the scope of this work, it should be noted that varying copolymer properties may affect the functionality of membrane proteins. 73 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although beyond the scope of this work, it should be noted that varying copolymer properties may affect the functionality of membrane proteins. 73 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, halogenated copolymers may be useful for dedicated biophysical techniques, e.g., the use of (i) fluorinated copolymers, such as 4-CF 3 SMA, for 19 F-NMR studies, (ii) brominated copolymers for MS experiments due to their convenient isotopic signature, and (iii) copolymers with heavier halogens (i.e., 4-BrSMA or 4-ISMA) for EM microscopy where the polymers/particles could potentially be visualized more easily due to the scattering of the dense halogen atoms. Although beyond the scope of this work, it should be noted that varying copolymer properties may affect the functionality of membrane proteins …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, DIBMA is less efficient in solubilizing some of the membrane proteins as compared to SMA, and the stability of DIBMA-based nanodiscs appears to be lower than that of SMA-based nanodiscs [ 162 ]. However, the larger size of DIBMA can be advantageous in accommodating membrane proteins with multiple transmembrane domains (or protein–protein complexes), thus can provide a flexible environment for the protein to be active, as seen in the case of GPCR rhodopsin [ 194 ]. In contrast, SMA- and cationic poly(styrene- co -maleimide) (SMI)-based nanodiscs prevented the conversion of light-activated rhodopsin Meta-I form to the fully active rhodopsin Meta-II form, suggesting that the smaller size nanodiscs and the styrene moiety of the polymers may be restricting protein dynamics or causing an unwanted conformational change.…”
Section: Limitations Of Ionic Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this technology, major differences in lipid composition between the central and rim regions of rod outer segment discs were described ( Sander et al, 2021 ). The same methods can be used in vitro to study the impact of changes in lipid bilayer composition on receptor activity ( Grime et al, 2021 ; Szundi et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%