2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in swimbladder volume between Baltic and Norwegian spring-spawning herring: Consequences for mean target strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested that environmental factors cause different morphological adaptations within species (Fassler et al, 2008) and consequentially backscattering properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that environmental factors cause different morphological adaptations within species (Fassler et al, 2008) and consequentially backscattering properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general value −71.2 dB of b 20 for sprat and herring obtained in high-saline waters and used in the Baltic International Acoustic Survey (ICES 2009) is probably too low for fishes in the eastern Baltic Sea. This is primarily because the fish need a larger swimbladder volume to obtain neutral buoyancy due to the lower salinity here, which implies that the value of b 20 is higher (Didrikas & Hansson 2004, Fässler et al 2008. To estimate b 20 , the distribution of TS in the dark hours with dispersed fish was related to the length distribution of sprat as the dominant species in the trawl catches.…”
Section: Hydroacousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of these models is justified by the assumption that important acoustic scattering parameters, such as the distribution of angle of orientation and animal size, do not vary significantly in the survey area during relevant seasons, so that echo features revealed by empirical measurements are representative in the pertinent context. However, due to the same reason, the limitation of these empirical models should be recognized and cautions should be taken when model parameters are extrapolated (Fässler et al, 2008). Nevertheless, empirical measurements from these studies and the resulting prediction intervals in the regression models provide important quantitative measures for the natural variability of echoes that ought to be appreciated in the modeling and analysis of in-situ echoes from live animals (Gorska and Ona, 2003a,b;Stanton et al, 1993a) (also see Sec.…”
Section: Echoes From Individual Marine Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the narrowband TS model was derived using measurements from Atlantic herring in Norwegian waters (Ona, 2003). Therefore, the application of this model on data collected in the Gulf of Maine represents an extrapolation to this regression model (Fässler et al, 2008) and is likely to produce biased results. This is because the applicability of empirical or semi-empirical TS models are generally justified by the assumption that the distribution of angle of orientation, behavior, and life history state of the measured population are representative of the target population (Sec.…”
Section: Errors Associated With the Estimation Of The Numerical Densimentioning
confidence: 99%