2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in teachers’ comments on classroom events as indicators of their professional development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
32
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Krull, Oras & Sisask, 2007;Harford & MacRuairc, 2008;Fernandez, 2010). Yet the notion of critical reflection is not well-developed or explored within the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Krull, Oras & Sisask, 2007;Harford & MacRuairc, 2008;Fernandez, 2010). Yet the notion of critical reflection is not well-developed or explored within the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within educational contexts, critical reflection is often associated with spoken discourse and because of its flexible character, it is viewed as a central part of teacher education for unpacking privileged positions and empowering participants to adopt valued professional positions (e.g. Krull, Oras & Sisask, 2007;Harford & MacRuairc, 2008;Fernandez, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clarke, 1997;Powell, 2005). There are benefits for participating teachers reflecting on their own work, but also valuable and often missed (Alexander, 2000) potential insights to be contributed by learners, and alternative, perceptive and, as Krull, Oras, and Sisask (2007) found, critical insights that can be contributed by uninvolved teachers.…”
Section: The Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Récemment, plusieurs études reposent sur les commen taires des formés et des formateurs de terrain face aux images vidéo de l'activité du stagiaire. Cette méthodologie, basée sur ce qui est dit sur la pratique en classe par les stagiaires, plus proche de leur activité, est pensée pour identifier les différences de stratégie d'observation et de perception des évé-nements en classe entre stagiaire et tuteur (Krull et al, 2007), pour apprécier l'influence du travail d'analyse vidéo sur la relation tutorale (Whitehead & Fitzgerald, 2007), ou encore pour témoigner d'une amélioration de la posture réflexive des enseignants stagiaires (Schepens et al, 2007). Au travers de ces résultats, on peut identifier un premier paradoxe : alors que les recherches placent le tutorat au centre teurs sur les conceptions pédagogiques des enseignants débutants (Daguzon & Goigoux, 2007).…”
Section: Les Paradoxes Des Recherchesunclassified