1989
DOI: 10.1093/geront/29.6.814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the Household Composition of Elders by Age, Gender, and Area of Residence

Abstract: Using a new procedure for coding the relationships of elders to other household members, we examined age, gender, and area-of-residence differences in household type and generational composition. The majority of elders live in some form of family household; most prevalent are two-person, married-couple-only households at ages 65-79, one-person households at ages 80-89, and two-generation households at ages 90+. Overall, elders are more likely to live in two- than in three-generation households.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these households, we distinguish multigenerational households—those that contain MHUs from multiple generations, such as households including adult children and their elderly parents—from all other types of extended‐family or nonkin households. Following prior work, we infer the relationships among MHUs based on relationship to the householder (Coward, Cutler, & Schmidt, 1989; Glick et al, 1997; Schmertmann, Boyd, Serow, & White, 2000). For example, in a household with three MHUs, if the first MHU head was the householder, the second was the child of the householder, and the third was the sibling of the householder, we would code the third MHU as the uncle or aunt of the second MHU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these households, we distinguish multigenerational households—those that contain MHUs from multiple generations, such as households including adult children and their elderly parents—from all other types of extended‐family or nonkin households. Following prior work, we infer the relationships among MHUs based on relationship to the householder (Coward, Cutler, & Schmidt, 1989; Glick et al, 1997; Schmertmann, Boyd, Serow, & White, 2000). For example, in a household with three MHUs, if the first MHU head was the householder, the second was the child of the householder, and the third was the sibling of the householder, we would code the third MHU as the uncle or aunt of the second MHU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas with dispersed populations are believed to have fewer health care resources available and the residents of these areas experience substantial difficulties in accessing social and health services (Clarke and . Recent demographic studies have distineuished between areas in terms of both a metro-" politan-nonmetropolitan county dimension and an urban-ma1 area dimension (Coward, Cutler and Schmidt, 1989;Fuguitt, Brown and Beale, 1989). The present study is unable to catego& respondents' location by more than the metropolitan status of the county because PSAs are delineated by county.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…option particularly when they suffer from health problems (Mickus et al, 1997). One finding was that the percentage of elderly persons residing in multi-generational households increases starting at 75 years of age (Coward et al, 1989). Elderly women suffer greater limitations and disabilities and are more likely to live with family for the care they provide (Silverstein et al, 1995).…”
Section: The Scope Of Intergenerational Co-residencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mudarse con descendientes es un recurso del que se benefician especialmente cuando sufren problemas de salud (Mickus et al, 1997). Un argumento esgrimido es que, a partir de los 75 años, conforme asciende la edad crece el porcentaje de personas mayores residiendo en hogares plurigeneracionales (Coward et al, 1989). Las ancianas padecen limitaciones y discapacidades más severas, siendo particularmente propensas a convivir con familiares para ser cuidadas (Silverstein et al, 1995).…”
unclassified