1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-1281(97)80007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the localization of the postsynaptic nitric oxide synthase I and acetylcholinesterase suggest a heterogeneity of neuromuscular junctions in rat and mouse skeletal muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, after discovery of the nitric oxide (NO) in the skeletal muscle, the influence of NO and inhibitors of NOS on muscle contractillity was also investigated (2 -4). It is known that the neuronal isoform of NOS (nNOS) is predominantly localized postsynaptically at the neuromuscular junction in the skeletal muscle (5) and that the enzyme responsible for NO production is activated during repetitive contraction of the skeletal muscle. Therefore, during passive incubation, a mouse diaphragm produces approx.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after discovery of the nitric oxide (NO) in the skeletal muscle, the influence of NO and inhibitors of NOS on muscle contractillity was also investigated (2 -4). It is known that the neuronal isoform of NOS (nNOS) is predominantly localized postsynaptically at the neuromuscular junction in the skeletal muscle (5) and that the enzyme responsible for NO production is activated during repetitive contraction of the skeletal muscle. Therefore, during passive incubation, a mouse diaphragm produces approx.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, nNOS was shown to be concentrated in the postsynaptic (Grozdanovic et al 1997) and presynaptic regions of normal neuromuscular junctions, where it appears to be located in nerve terminals or Schwann cells of denervated muscle fibres (Ribera et al 1998), or in the Schwann cells of regular inner- Fig. 2.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies done to establish the localisation of nNOS have used regular immunocytochemistry at the light microscopy level in transverse sections of normal skeletal muscle. However, with this technique insufficient resolution of the pre-and postsynaptic compartments of the nmj is obtained (Grozdanovic et al 1997). In addition, the few immunocytochemical studies at the electron microscopy level have yielded conflicting results about the localisation of nNOS at the neuromuscular junction of normal fibres (Ribera et al 1998 ;Descarries et al 1998).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcolemmal neuronal NOS has been shown to be bound to the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex through a N-terminal PDZ protein motif interacting with ␣1-syntrophin, which again binds to the C-terminus of the dystrophin molecule (Adams et al, 1993;Ahn and Kunkel, 1995;Brenman et al, 1996;Watkins et al, 2000). This syntrophin-neuronal NOS complex is highly expressed on the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction in most species (Chao et al, 1997;Grozdanovic et al, 1997a;Kusner and Kaminski, 1996;Oliver et al, 1996;Ribera et al, 1998).…”
Section: Constitutive Expression Of Nos Isoforms In Different Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of NOS and NO in skeletal muscle indicate that altered expression of NOS and production of NO may have manifold consequences for normal muscle development and function as well as for the pathophysiology of muscle fiber damage in neuromuscular diseases Christova et al, 1997;Grozdanovic et al, 1997c;Lee et al, 1994;Silvagno et al, 1996). Especially in muscle fiber innervation, NO and NOS concentrated at the neuromuscular endplate (Chao et al, 1997;Grozdanovic et al, 1997a;, 1996;Oliver et al, 1996) may play a role under normal as well as pathological conditions, which shall be summarized by this short review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%