2007
DOI: 10.3161/068.042.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the Nestling Diets of Sympatric RedstartsPhoenicurus phoenicurusand Black RedstartsP. ochruros: Species-Specific Preferences or Responses to Food Supply?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding supports the general foraging strategy based on available food, including remarkable differences in diet composition between individuals observed at the same time in similar habitats (Zamora 1992, Hodar 1998, Nicolai 1998, 2001; see also Fig. 2), and nestlings of the Black Redstart (Sedlacek et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding supports the general foraging strategy based on available food, including remarkable differences in diet composition between individuals observed at the same time in similar habitats (Zamora 1992, Hodar 1998, Nicolai 1998, 2001; see also Fig. 2), and nestlings of the Black Redstart (Sedlacek et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, some data from the Mediterranean region reveal the lack of plant material in the autumn-winter diet of the Black Redstart, which indicates a general foraging strategy based on the diet consisting of available food resources (Herrera 1978, Hodar 1998, Nicolai 1998. Until now most papers on the diet of the Black Redstart have concerned mainly nestlings (Flinks & Pfeifer 1990, Sedlacek et al 2007) and adult birds on wintering grounds in the Mediterranean region (Herrera 1978, Zamora 1992, Hodar 1998, Nicolai 1998, 2001, including data on frugivory (Crocq 2002. However, detailed studies on the diet of Black Redstarts during summer and autumn in central and northern Europe are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both species of nightingales have a similar diet in general - they feed on small invertebrates on the ground in dense shrubby vegetation [ 46 ] - it is possible that minor differences in diet have evolved between the species in sympatry. These differences could be caused by either a separation of their feeding niches in sites where both species co-occur or by different food supplies in different microhabitats [ 66 ]. Territories of L. luscinia tend to occur in wetter sites in the region of sympatry, while L. megarhynchos is more frequent in drier places, probably due to displacement by interference competition [ 43 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set the traps on May 25, June 16, and July 7, for a period of 72 h. All arthropods were conserved in 70% ethyl alcohol and classified into eight different taxa and five size classes (\2, 2-5, 5-10, 10-20, [20 mm). Only insects and spiders measuring 2-20 mm were used for further analysis, because it is unlikely that smaller and larger prey items are an important part of the diet of the common redstart (Sedlácek et al 2007). Lepidoptera larvae [20 mm, which may be an important prey for nestlings, were only exceptionally caught in the pitfall traps (three individuals in total).…”
Section: Arthropod Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%