2024
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48749-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the nutritional quality of improved finger millet genotypes in Ethiopia

Demeke Teklu,
Dawd Gashu,
Edward J. M. Joy
et al.

Abstract: Improved crop genotypes are constantly introduced. However, information on their nutritional quality is generally limited. The present study reports the proximate composition and the concentration and relative bioavailability of minerals of improved finger millets of different genotypes. Grains of finger millet genotypes (n = 15) grown in research station during 2019 and 2020 in Ethiopia, and replicated three times in a randomized complete block design, were analysed for proximate composition, mineral concentr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing environment may have an impact on the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of mineral elements [12]. Similar to the current study, variability in mineral contents among different nger millet genotypes was reported in previous studies [21,23,28,29]. One of the best ways to address severe malnutrition issues is through bioforti cation, which increases the density and availability of micronutrients [30].…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The growing environment may have an impact on the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of mineral elements [12]. Similar to the current study, variability in mineral contents among different nger millet genotypes was reported in previous studies [21,23,28,29]. One of the best ways to address severe malnutrition issues is through bioforti cation, which increases the density and availability of micronutrients [30].…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The highest protein content found in this study (11.05%) exceeds the protein content reported in a previous study by Nakarani et al [17], which was between 6.7 and 8.0%. Various studies have also revealed signi cant variations in protein content among nger millet landraces that ranged from 6.7-12.3% [18], 6.3-10.5% [19], 3.55-18.20% [20], and 10-14.6% [21]. Protein is the second major component of nger millet in terms of nutritional content [22], suggesting its potential as an alternative protein source in diets and/or as a supplement, especially for rural communities.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1-37 mg/100 g) and potassium (430-490 mg/100 g) (Backiyalakshmi et al, 2023;Maharajan et al, 2022;Puranik et al, 2020;Upadhyaya et al, 2010). Higher calcium content was reported in Ethiopian finger millet varieties designated Diga-2 (BKFM0010) and Bareda (BRC-356-1) with 550 to 589 mg/100 g (Lule et al, 2020;Teklu et al, 2024), surpassing the previously reported value of 344 mg/100 g (Backiyalakshmi et al, 2023;Maharajan et al, 2022;Puranik et al, 2017Puranik et al, , 2020Upadhyaya et al, 2010). The substantial genetic diversity present in finger millet forms the foundation for successful breeding programs.…”
Section: Genetic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expression of these vital traits. Finger millet grains composed of the following macro-nutrients in mg/100 g: P (130.0-250.0), K (430.0-668.8), Ca (50.0-589.0), S (106.1-149.0), Na (6.3-41.6) and Mg (78.0-201.0) (Backiyalakshmi et al, 2023;Kumar, Rani, et al, 2021;Puranik et al, 2020;Teklu et al, 2024). Also, vital micro-nutrients are found in the grains (mg/100 g): Fe (2.5-53.4), Mn (17.6-201.0) and Zn (1.0-36.6) Kumar, Rani, et al, 2021;Puranik et al, 2020).…”
Section: Genetic Gain Estimation and Documentation Support Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%