2000
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.130195397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the polar clustering of the high- and low-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli

Abstract: The chemosensory complexes in Escherichia coli are localized predominantly in large aggregates at one or both of the cell poles, however, neither the role of the polar localization nor the role of the clustering is understood. In E. coli, the two classes of chemoreceptors or transducers, high-and low-abundance, differ in their ability to support chemotaxis when expressed as the sole chemoreceptor type in the cell. In this study, we examined both the contribution of individual chemoreceptors to polar clustering… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the pentapeptide motif is required for maintaining an appropriate level of receptor methylation by increasing the local concentration of CheR around the receptor cluster in the cell. This interpretation is consistent with the following facts : (i) CheR is much less abundant than the receptor molecules (Simms et al, 1987) ; (ii) the overproduction of CheR suppresses the defect of the mutations in the pentapeptide sequence (Okumura et al, 1998 ;Shiomi et al, 2000) ; (iii) the receptor molecules form a cluster with CheW and CheA at a cell pole (Maddock & Shapiro, 1993 ;Lybarger & Maddock, 2000) ; (iv) a receptor dimer with the CheRbinding sequence can help methylation of a neighbouring receptor dimer without the CheR-binding sequence (Le Moual & Koshland, 1997 ;Li et al, 1997) ; (v) GFP-CheR localized to cell poles in the presence, but not in the absence, of a chemoreceptor with the NWETF sequence (Shiomi et al, 2002). Okumura et al (1998) showed that cells expressing mutant Tcp (NWESLA) respond to, but do not adapt to the repellent glycerol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is likely that the pentapeptide motif is required for maintaining an appropriate level of receptor methylation by increasing the local concentration of CheR around the receptor cluster in the cell. This interpretation is consistent with the following facts : (i) CheR is much less abundant than the receptor molecules (Simms et al, 1987) ; (ii) the overproduction of CheR suppresses the defect of the mutations in the pentapeptide sequence (Okumura et al, 1998 ;Shiomi et al, 2000) ; (iii) the receptor molecules form a cluster with CheW and CheA at a cell pole (Maddock & Shapiro, 1993 ;Lybarger & Maddock, 2000) ; (iv) a receptor dimer with the CheRbinding sequence can help methylation of a neighbouring receptor dimer without the CheR-binding sequence (Le Moual & Koshland, 1997 ;Li et al, 1997) ; (v) GFP-CheR localized to cell poles in the presence, but not in the absence, of a chemoreceptor with the NWETF sequence (Shiomi et al, 2002). Okumura et al (1998) showed that cells expressing mutant Tcp (NWESLA) respond to, but do not adapt to the repellent glycerol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This could indicate that the polar accumulation is functionally relevant and that it supports proper function of the two sensor kinases in an unknown way. Clusters of chemotaxis sensors together with the sensor-related proteins CheA and CheW are well documented (Lybarger & Maddock, 2000). The clusters are believed to support stimulus integration and the sensitivity of the sensors (Sourjik, 2004;Thiem et al, 2007).…”
Section: Comparison Of Dcus Accumulation With That Of Other Localizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localization of these histidine kinases within the cell often relates to their site of function, and typically features a polar localization. The chemoreceptors of chemotaxis (Lybarger & Maddock, 2000) show also an asymmetric distribution within E. coli cells, although no asymmetric distribution is expected for chemotaxis regulation. A uniform distribution over the cell membrane is assumed for kinases controlling metabolic processes or perceiving stimuli that are evenly distributed over the cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wild-type, sec7, and sec12 cells expressing HA-Atg8 under the control of the native ATG8 promoter were grown in rich medium at 24°C and then shifted to 37°C in either the same medium or in SD-N to induce autophagy for 2 h. Cells were then fixed with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, treated with sodium periodate, dehydrated with ethanol, and finally embedded with LR White resin (Ted Pella, Redding, CA) as described previously (Lybarger and Maddock, 2000). After resin polymerization, 70-to 80-nm sections were mounted on nickel grids, incubated first with anti-HA antibody (1:25 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and successively with 12-nm colloidal gold-Affinipure goat anti-mouse IgG (1:30 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA).…”
Section: Immunoelectron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%