2016
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the role of black race and stroke risk factors for first vs recurrent stroke

Abstract: Objectives: To assess whether black race and other cerebrovascular risk factors have a differential effect on first vs recurrent stroke events.Methods: Estimate the differences in the magnitude of the association of demographic (age, back race, sex) or stroke risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, or heart disease) for first vs recurrent stroke from a longitudinal cohort study of 29,682 black or white participants aged 45 years and older.Resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these possibilities, medical factors have been the most widely studied and while some racial differences exist, they are generally of small magnitude and unlikely to explain the wide differences in outcomes. 25, 26 Further research is needed to understand racial differences in post-stroke disability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these possibilities, medical factors have been the most widely studied and while some racial differences exist, they are generally of small magnitude and unlikely to explain the wide differences in outcomes. 25, 26 Further research is needed to understand racial differences in post-stroke disability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the estimated 795,000 stroke events in the US, about 185,000 (23%) are recurrent events. 31 While much less is known about the role of risk factors and the Black-White disparities for secondary stroke events, 32 data from REGARDS have shown no Black-White differences in the risk of recurrent stroke, 33 and as such it is relatively unlikely that secondary stroke prevention is a pathway to reducing the Black-White disparity in stroke mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the REGARDS study, most of the traditional risk factors (eg, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy) play a similar role in predicting incident and recurrent stroke; however, a history of heart disease was associated with an RR of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.67) for incident stroke but only a nonsignificant (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.85-1.40) risk for recurrent stroke. 229 The substantial (P=0.0002) age-by-race interaction for incident stroke (with HRs of ≈3.0 at age 45 but 1.0 for age 85) was absent (P=0.99) for recurrent stroke, and no difference could be detected between the risk of recurrent strokes in African Americans and whites. 229…”
Section: Risk Stratification After Ascvd Eventsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…229 The substantial (P=0.0002) age-by-race interaction for incident stroke (with HRs of ≈3.0 at age 45 but 1.0 for age 85) was absent (P=0.99) for recurrent stroke, and no difference could be detected between the risk of recurrent strokes in African Americans and whites. 229…”
Section: Risk Stratification After Ascvd Eventsmentioning
confidence: 97%