Differences in the trait compositions of non-indigenous and native plants across Germany

Abstract

This paper explores the differences in the trait compositions of non-indigenous (neophytic) and native plant species for selected traits in Germany. Our set of functional traits addresses species' reproductive biology, life history, morphology and ecophysiology. To take account of broadscale heterogeneity across the country we compared the relative frequencies of neophytes and natives with particular trait attributes at the scale of grid cells (c. 130 km 2 each). Subsequently, we compared the differences at the grid cell scale to the differences in the corresponding comparisons at the scale of the entire country. Finally, we explored how variation in the trait compositions of the nonindigenous species across the country relates to variation in the trait compositions of the natives. We found remarkable differences in the trait compositions of neophytes and natives at the grid cell scale.Neophytes were over-represented in insect-and selfpollinated species and in species with a later and longer flowering season. Furthermore, the proportions of species with mesomorphic or hygromorphic leaf anatomy, of annual herbs and of trees as well as of non-clonals and polyploids were significantly higher in neophytes than in natives. These differences at the grid cell scale could vary distinctly from the corresponding differences observed at the country scale. This result highlights the complexity of the invasion process and suggests an importance of spatial scale for the comparisons. Correlation analysis indicated, that for traits relating to plant morphology and ecophysiology, the relative frequencies of the non-indigenous species increased with those of the natives. This suggests that favourable environments for natives with particular attributes constitute an increased suitability for neophytes with these attributes as well. Our study provides a step forward towards an integrated understanding of traits in plant invasions across spatial scales and broad-scale heterogeneity and underlines the necessity to understand the role of functional traits in plant invasions with reference to spatial scale and in the context of the environment.

Interactions between alien plant species traits and habitat characteristics in agricultural landscapes in Finland

“…However, we also detected some significant differences between the traits of native and alien species, which gives support to the opposite understanding of diverging species traits (e.g., Pyšek et al 1995;Crawley et al 1996;Sutherland 2004;Leishman and Thompson 2005;Pyšek and Richardson 2007;Küster et al 2010). This pattern varied according to the habitat type.…”

Simulated migration in a long-term climate change experiment: invasions impeded by dispersal limitation, not biotic resistance

“…For instance, dispersal may be limited by low seed production at the northern range limit due to photoperiod or shorter growing seasons, which result in migration being dependent on rare long‐distance dispersal. Self‐incompatibility may further reduce the migration rate of a species if dispersal events are rare (Küster et al. 2010).…”

Are Introduced Species Better Dispersers Than Native Species? A Global Comparative Study of Seed Dispersal Distance

“…[35,54,55]) and if they do, to identify which traits or characteristics are associated with species that have become established in new environment (e.g. [4,56,57]). However, we ran ANOVA tests comparing native species to a subset of invasive introduced species (n = 46), to determine whether the patterns we observed across the full dataset hold up when non-invasive introduced species were excluded.…”