REFERENCESWhere is the evidence that p-glycoprotein limits brain uptake of antiepileptic drug and contributes to drug resistance in epilepsy?
To the Editors:The article by Sisodiya and Goldstein provides an interesting and novel perspective on the current debate over the role of p-glycoprotein (Pgp), or lack thereof, in multidrug resistance in epilepsy. The authors point to a recent report showing that a synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (i.e., a so-called silent mutation) at the 3435 locus of the multidrug resistant 1 (MDR1 or ABCB1) gene alters Pgp conformation and its interaction with drug substrates and inhibitors, while expression levels of mRNA and protein remain the same (Kimchi-Sarfaty et al., 2007). The synonymous mutation apparently affects the timing of cotranslational folding of Pgp. Based on this postulate, Sisodiya and Goldstein suggest that the functional impact of ABCB1 genotype variation, at least at the 3435 locus, is magnified or becomes apparent when the transcriptional machinery is under stress. They then surmised that severity of "drug-resistance" phenotype (i.e., the demand placed on ABCB1 translation if upregulation of ABCB1 transcription were to occur at the brain capillary endothelium in response to the epileptogenic process or seizure activity) may be an overlooked variable in previous investigations on the possible role of Pgp in rendering resistance to multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Lack of clear definition and classification of drug-resistance phenotype might have accounted for the discrepancies in the studies of P-pg and drug resistant epilepsy.We agree that differences in the drug-resistance phenotypes between earlier clinical studies may have been a confounding variable; however, a more basic issue is the lack of convincing evidence that (1) AEDs are highaffinity substrates of Pgp and (2) the uptake of the AEDs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is dependent on Pgp, especially in cases of apparent drug resistance. There is significant disagreement in the literature as to whether or not AEDs are all Pgp substrates. Recently, Baltes et al. (2007)
GRAY MATTERSgathered in animal models to human epilepsies. Overall, the available data in the literature indicate that AEDs are either not substrates or at best very weak substrates of Pgp. One way to illustrate to the relative impact of Pgp on drug uptake into the brain is to compare the reported effects of selective Pgp inhibitors (verapamil, PSC-833) on the brain-to-plasma or microdialysate-to-plasma ratio for AEDs and classic Pgp substrates, namely, vincristine, cyclosporine, and digoxin. For vincristine, Pgp inhibition resulted in a 9-fold increase in brain uptake (Drion et al., 1996). In comparison, Pgp inhibition only increased phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and felbamate, 0.5-to 1.1-fold over baseline Potschka et al., , 2002. In the ABCB1a knockout mouse model, vinblastine, cyclosporine, and digoxin brain uptake increased 20-to 50-fold (Schinkel et al., 1994;Schinkel et al., 1995). In compari...