2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2005.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the valuation of earnings and book value: Regulation effects or industry effects?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, consistent with the view of Ballas and Hevas (2005) who predict and document that industry classification is an important source of variation in value relevance of earnings and book value, a sectoral analysis is performed to answer the second research question: How does the IFRS adoption impact the value relevance in the different sectors? The sectoral analysis investigates how value relevance changes in the three different macro-sectors (Finance, Industry and Services) from the pre-adoption period to the post-adoption one.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, consistent with the view of Ballas and Hevas (2005) who predict and document that industry classification is an important source of variation in value relevance of earnings and book value, a sectoral analysis is performed to answer the second research question: How does the IFRS adoption impact the value relevance in the different sectors? The sectoral analysis investigates how value relevance changes in the three different macro-sectors (Finance, Industry and Services) from the pre-adoption period to the post-adoption one.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies examine the impact of changes of accounting information on value relevance by using the Ohlson (1995)'s price model (e.g., Aharony, Barniv and Falk, 2010;Ballas and Hevas, 2005;Bao and Chow, 1999;Barth, 1991;Burgstahler and Dichev, 1997;Eccher et al, 1996;Fang et al, 2013;Fung et al, 2010;Graham and King, 2000;Landsman, 1986;Liu et al, 2011;Liu and Liu, 2007;Wang et al, 2005). These studies focus on three main areas of value relevance: (1) the increase/decrease in value relevance of accounting information due to the application of environmental changes or new accounting standards (Aharony, Barniv and Falk., 2010;Ahmed, et al, 2006;Brown, et al, 1999;Chen, et al, 2001;Collins, et al, 1997;Fang, et al, 2013;Jaggi and Zhao, 2002;Lin and Chen, 2005;Wang, et al, 2005).…”
Section: Earnings Management and Value Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies focus on three main areas of value relevance: (1) the increase/decrease in value relevance of accounting information due to the application of environmental changes or new accounting standards (Aharony, Barniv and Falk., 2010;Ahmed, et al, 2006;Brown, et al, 1999;Chen, et al, 2001;Collins, et al, 1997;Fang, et al, 2013;Jaggi and Zhao, 2002;Lin and Chen, 2005;Wang, et al, 2005). For example, Collins et al (1997) (2) the impact of company/industry features (Ballas and Hevas, 2005;Francis and Schipper, 1999;Lev and Zarowin, 1999). For example, Ballas and Hevas (2005) and value relevance (Barth et al, 2008;Lang et al, 2006;Liu, et al, 2011;Paananen and Lin, 2009).…”
Section: Earnings Management and Value Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Myers (1999), Barth et al (1999), Canel & Morel (2001, Ota (2002), and Leccadito & Veltri (2014) ISSN 1946-052X 2017 These empirical studies were precise to empirical testing of O'95. Apart from these studies number of other studies has been done to find value relevance of accounting information in different markets with O'95 Model (Collins et al, 1997;Francis & Shipper, 1999;Brown et al, 1999;Lev &Zarowin, 1999;Kim &Kross, 2005;Ballas, &Hevas, 2005;Balachandran & Mohanram, 2011;Shrivastava, 2014).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Based On O'95mentioning
confidence: 99%