2016
DOI: 10.1108/el-05-2015-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of Pareto principle performance in e-resource download distribution

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore whether the databases from a certain library are Pareto-compliant or not? If so, to what extent is the Pareto principle performance evident among these databases? The other purpose is to determine the differences in Pareto principle performance according to time change and database type. Design/methodology/approach Data on full-text downloads from six e-resources – Elsevier ScienceDirect (SD), Wiley Blackwell, Springer Journal, EBSCO Business Source Premier (BS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 20% was used as test sets. This division is known as the Pareto principle (80/20 rule) that states that, for many events, roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes [50]. For determining what images should be included in the training, validating, or testing part, they were selected randomly.…”
Section: Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 20% was used as test sets. This division is known as the Pareto principle (80/20 rule) that states that, for many events, roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes [50]. For determining what images should be included in the training, validating, or testing part, they were selected randomly.…”
Section: Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%