Differences of Results between Women’s and between Men’s Finalists in the Running, Jumping and Throwing Disciplines of the Finalists of the World Championships

Abstract

Background: The Worlds Athletics Championships, along with the Olympic Games, represent the largest review of athletes in which they record top results, often projecting new world records. Any research that analyzes top athletes contributes to shedding light on a number of issues. It is especially interesting to analyze and compare the results of athletes from one time distance. The main goal of the research was to determine the result differences in sprint, jumping and throwing disciplines, between men's and women's finalists participating in the World Athletics Championships in Edmonton, 2001 and Doha in 2019. Methods: the current study included a total of 493 finalists (247 men's and 246 women's) of the World Championships in Edmonton, 2001 and Doha, 2019. The results in sprint, jumping and throwing disciplines were analyzed in order to determine the result differences in the championship finals. To obtain the necessary information, a t-test for independent samples was applied and the relevant statistical parameters were calculated. Results: the results were confirmed between the final evident differences in all disciplines. Men in Edmonton were successful in 41% of the discipline (400m, pole vault, discus throw, hammer throw, javelin throw), and in Doha 59% of the discipline (100m, 200m, 110H, high jump, long jump, triple jump), while in the category of women's finalists, participants in Edmonton were successful in 17% of disciplines (long jump, throwing the ball), while female athletes were successful in 83% of disciplines (100m, 200m, 400m, 110H, triple jump, high jump, high jump with a pole, Throwing a spear, throwing a discus, throwing a hammer). Statistically significant differences between male finalists were recorded only in the disciplines: 200m (t=2.318; p<0.039) , throwing the ball (t=-2.939; p<0.009) and hammer throw (t=-2.802; p<0.013) , and in female finalists in the 200m disciplines (t=2.402; p<0.025) , pole vault (t=-5.552; p<0.000) and hammer throw (t=-6.410; p<0.000). Conclusion: the consequences of this distribution of differences finalist can be found in various morphological, motor and biomechanical parameters, technical experience, neuromuscular movements, level of motivation and preparedness at the time of onset and other endogenous-exogenous factors.

Video analysis of throwing techniques in Collegiate Shot-Put athletes: A visual exploration of throwing styles and performance factors

“…The glide technique resulted in a mean distance of 9.11±2.24 units, while the rotational technique exhibited a slightly higher mean distance of 9.50±2.92 units. This slight difference is consistent with the notion that the rotational technique can offer a competitive advantage due to its potential for generating greater power and momentum (Garcia-Carrillo et al, 2023;Kardor et al, 2023;Pavlović et al, 2020). In the case of female athletes, a similar trend is observed.…”

Analysis on Performance Development Trend of Track-and-Field Throwing Events Based on Blockchain and Mobile Big Data

“…Lindqvist A. S. and others believe that using various technical means to encrypt the network transmission chain has become a common topic faced by information science and management science. How to build a new model of information trust and transmission suitable for large-scale and rapid promotion has become an important issue concerned by researchers [7]. Pavlovi R. and others put forward the encryption protection chain products of blocks and made continuous follow-up research.…”

Anthropological profile of long jumpers: Differences between Olympic games finalists

“…A number of authors analyzed the morphological profile of athletes in the jumping disciplines of participants in the Olympic Games and World Championships in both competitions (Pavlović et al, 2012;Pavlović et al, 2013) by analyzing differences in morphological space segments or kinematic parameters between finalists. (Pavlović et al, 2016;Ljubičić et al, 2017) or result differences (Pavlović et al, 2020). The results were mainly different depending on the sample, discipline, sex, morphological parameters, neuromuscular activities, other exogenous and endogenous factors.…”