2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0958344009990164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences that make the difference: a study of functionalities in synchronous CMC

Abstract: This paper has a dual aim: to situate functionalities among the complex of factors that help shape online interactions and to explore the heterogeneity of audio conferencing and its implications. Following a critical discursive synthesis of the treatment of variables in the literature, attention focuses on the distinctive and diverse characteristics of synchronous audio environments. The existence of a synchronous-asynchronous dichotomy is questioned and the effects of a number of differences are highlighted. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more research is needed to identify the precise skills and strategies that can be taught to teachers and students in preparation for online language tutorials (see Hampel and Stickler, 2005). As Scheffel-Dunand (2006: 353) points out, ‘literacy and orality are social practices whose forms and functions correlate with context of situation, personal involvement and audience.’ This context includes the communication environment with its particular mix of modes which has an impact on how these are best used (Kenning, 2010). New patterns of communication emerge as a result, for example, the combination of modes in complex IRF exchanges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, more research is needed to identify the precise skills and strategies that can be taught to teachers and students in preparation for online language tutorials (see Hampel and Stickler, 2005). As Scheffel-Dunand (2006: 353) points out, ‘literacy and orality are social practices whose forms and functions correlate with context of situation, personal involvement and audience.’ This context includes the communication environment with its particular mix of modes which has an impact on how these are best used (Kenning, 2010). New patterns of communication emerge as a result, for example, the combination of modes in complex IRF exchanges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 179). Finally, Kenning (2010) specifically looks at the different impact of using voice and text chat in two different environments, identifying a number of factors that affect discourse patterns: the level of integration with other devices and tools; tutor privileges; the number and function of icons; and the type of transmission, that is, full versus half duplex ( op. cit .…”
Section: Multimodal Computer-mediated Communication and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the technological environment, repeating the study using a full-duplex (where interruptions are possible) rather than half-duplex system would help shed light on the effects of functionalities and help determine to what extent the findings of the present study are a function of the system used. Such studies are currently in short supply, yet have important pedagogical implications (Kenning, 2010). It would also be valuable to carry out comparisons between face-to-face and audio-conferencing environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings also point to the tremendous potential provided by multiple technologies. In other words, multimodal contexts offer learners opportunities to make choices and take control of not only which tools they elect to use, but also how to take advantage of the various features of the available technology to successfully complete the task at hand (Kenning, 2010).…”
Section: Technology Tasks and L2 Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%