2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different approaches for woven composite reinforcement forming simulation

Abstract: Different approaches used for the simulation of woven reinforcement forming are investigated. Especially several methods based on finite element approximation are presented. Some are based on continuous modelling, while others, called discrete or mesoscopic approaches, model the components of the fabric. A semi discrete finite element made of woven unit cells under biaxial tension and in-plane shear is detailed. In continuous approaches, the difficulty lies in the necessity to take the strong specificity of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one of these methods [16][17][18][19][20] specific finite elements are defined that are made of a discrete number of woven unit cells. The mechanical behaviour of these woven cells is obtained essentially by experimental analyses of the woven reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of these methods [16][17][18][19][20] specific finite elements are defined that are made of a discrete number of woven unit cells. The mechanical behaviour of these woven cells is obtained essentially by experimental analyses of the woven reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently many studies [4][5][6] have been conducted on the experimental determination of the shear mechanical behaviour of woven textiles. Relation between imperfections obtained during the process, like wrinkles, and the limits of the mechanical behaviour of the woven fabric (locking angle, for example) start to being studied but most often by finite element simulation [7][8] than by experimental approach. For the development of finite element tool dedicated to the forming step of woven fabric [8,[9][10] it's necessary to have some experimental results during the forming stage and not only at the end of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main shortcoming of this approach is clearly that the draping results do not depend on the actual fabric configuration, that is the type of weave which ultimately affects the deformability of the fabric. On the other hand, it resembles quite well manual draping operations but not the automated ones since static boundary conditions cannot be applied [2,9,10,19]. Despite some limitations, the kinematic draping is considered more robust than the mechanical one, especially when complex geometries are involved, offering a good compromise between accuracy and computational efforts [3].…”
Section: Numerical Methods For Drapingmentioning
confidence: 99%