2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
312
0
40

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 615 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
312
0
40
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, qCO 2 values in NF soil were lower, indicating more stable ecosystems, with greater efficiency of microorganisms to convert organic waste into microbial biomass and with greater sustainability, which is consistent with the history of the NF area and corroborates results published elsewhere (Tótola & Chaer, 2002;Gil-Sotres et al, 2005;Baretta, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, qCO 2 values in NF soil were lower, indicating more stable ecosystems, with greater efficiency of microorganisms to convert organic waste into microbial biomass and with greater sustainability, which is consistent with the history of the NF area and corroborates results published elsewhere (Tótola & Chaer, 2002;Gil-Sotres et al, 2005;Baretta, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Soil microbial enzymes play a key role in the decomposition of organic residues and are considered fundamentally as good indicators for soil quality (Gil-Sotres et al 2005). In order to evaluate the fluxes of elements in highly contaminated soils, hydrolytic enzymes such as GSA, PRA, and PSA involved in C, N and P cycles, respectively, were determined in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might result in contradictory conclusions in different studies when describing the effects of a contaminant or a given management on the soil quality (Gil-Sotres et al, 2005). Moreover, with the knowledge actually available, estimation of soil quality relying only on individual biochemical properties, simple indexes or ratios, cannot be considered reliable.…”
Section: Microbiological and Biochemical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%