2008
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.763227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Calculations of Ankle-Brachial Index and Their Impact on Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Abstract: Background-An ankle-brachial index (ABI; ratio of ankle and brachial systolic blood pressure) Ͻ0.9 indicates peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events. The aim of the present study was to address the prognostic value of different methods of ABI calculation. Methods and Results-In 831 patients admitted with chest pain for diagnostic heart catheterization, blood pressure of both anterior and posterior tibial arteries was measured. ABI was calculated for each leg with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
112
1
16

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
112
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The ankle brachial index was calculated by dividing the lower ankle SBP by the higher brachial SBP. 10 An ankle brachial index of ≤0.90 in either leg was considered to indicate peripheral arterial disease. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was determined using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation.…”
Section: Measurements and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ankle brachial index was calculated by dividing the lower ankle SBP by the higher brachial SBP. 10 An ankle brachial index of ≤0.90 in either leg was considered to indicate peripheral arterial disease. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was determined using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation.…”
Section: Measurements and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified ABI has been suggested as a more sensitive measure for identifying patients with cardiovascular risk than the conventional method. 45,46 However, this sensitivity comes at the cost of specificity, 46 and thus the modified ABI might be less suitable as a screening method in general practice among a population with a lower PAD prevalence than the populations studied by Espinola-Klein et al 45 and Schröder et al 46 As a result of the higher oscillometric ABI values, some investigators used receiver operating characteristics analysis to propose the use of a higher oscillometric ABI cutoff value for PAD diagnosis, varying Automated ankle-brachial index assessment WJ Verberk et al from 0.92 to 1.04. 7,19,32 Therefore, the use of a higher oscillometric ABI threshold close to 1.0 is expected to increase the diagnostic accuracy of PAD.…”
Section: Automated Ankle-brachial Index Assessment Wj Verberk Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients lied in supine position after resting at normal room temperature; measurements were taken at each ankle over the posterior tibial and dorsal pedal arteries. ABI was calculated as the lowest pressure of the ankles divided by the higher of the left and right arm pressures (Espinola-Klein et al 2008;Fowkes et al 2008). Carotid IMT and the noncardiac part of the general calcification score was determined by a single experienced radiologist who was blinded to patients' clinical information.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%