2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Coagulation Indicators in Predicting Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional coagulation indicators, including PT and APTT, were generally prolonged in a concentration-dependent pattern for dabigatran patients. [30][31][32][33] Anti-FIIa activity, as a specific test determined by chromogenic assay, has been recommended, and it demonstrated that peak anti-FIIa activity could be an indicator for predicting bleeding outcomes of dabigatran. 32,33 Consequently, our study focused on genetic variation on the direct outcomes of bleeding and indirect outcomes of PD, including anti-FIIa activity, APTT and PT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional coagulation indicators, including PT and APTT, were generally prolonged in a concentration-dependent pattern for dabigatran patients. [30][31][32][33] Anti-FIIa activity, as a specific test determined by chromogenic assay, has been recommended, and it demonstrated that peak anti-FIIa activity could be an indicator for predicting bleeding outcomes of dabigatran. 32,33 Consequently, our study focused on genetic variation on the direct outcomes of bleeding and indirect outcomes of PD, including anti-FIIa activity, APTT and PT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, PD indices determined qualitatively and quantitatively might be more conveniently accessible. Traditional coagulation indicators, including PT and APTT, were generally prolonged in a concentration‐dependent pattern for dabigatran patients 30–33 . Anti‐FIIa activity, as a specific test determined by chromogenic assay, has been recommended, and it demonstrated that peak anti‐FIIa activity could be an indicator for predicting bleeding outcomes of dabigatran 32,33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are also still learning about the role of coagulation test monitoring as there are limited data evaluating anti-FXa assays and the association with clinical outcomes. [29][30][31][32] The lack of routine monitoring is another benefit to using DOACs and perhaps there are certain criteria that warrant closer monitoring, but the therapeutic index of DOACs has yet to be fully elucidated. When these aspects are clear, we will be able to individualize and optimize apixaban therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the routine coagulation tests, such as PT-INR or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the monitoring of anti-FXa activity is not widely available in clinical practice. Previous studies indicated that FXa inhibitors were associated with a concentration-dependent prolongation of the PT [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. PT-INR is rapidly available and may help the clinicians evaluate the possibility of recent exposures of FXa-inhibitors in several emergent conditions, such as urgent procedures, major bleeding, or an acute stroke [ 2 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For dabigatran, the aPTT may provide a quantitative assessment of dabigatran serum level and anticoagulant activity. The relationship between dabigatran serum concentration and the aPTT value followed a curvilinear curve with a quadratic curve [ 2 , 7 , 8 ]. However, previous studies investigating whether the measurements of PT-INR or aPTT could be useful for monitoring or correlating with the concentration of rivaroxaban and dabigatran have showed conflicting results [ 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%