rugada syndrome is characterized by a ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads and associated with sudden cardiac death secondary to rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. 1 A recent consensus report proposed 3 types of ST-segment elevation (types 1 to 3) and indicated that a coved-type ST-segment elevation >0.2 mV (type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG)), in the presence or absence of Na channel blockers, is necessary for diagnosis of this syndrome. 2,3 Individuals with saddle-back type ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads (SB-ECG), which applies to type 2 or 3 ECG, are much more prevalent than those with type 1 ECG, 4 at a rate of 58/10,000 inhabitants in Japan. 5 Although previous reports show asymptomatic individuals with SB-ECG who exhibit a type 1 ECG under drug administration are low risk for fatal cardiac event for middle-term periods, 6,7 long-term prognosis in those individuals is still unclear. For individuals with SB-ECG, therefore, a drug provocation test using Na channel blockers is necessary and generally considered helpful to diagnose a type 1 ECG. 6,8,9 In some cases, the drug testing is accompanied with the risk of drug-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias. 3,10 It is difficult to undergo drug provocation testing for all individuals with SB-ECG because of the high prevalence. Although the differences between baseline ECG parameters of positive responders (PR) and negative responders (NR) on the drug testing have been reported, [11][12][13] it remains unclear which parameters on baseline ECG are clinically useful as predictors of test outcome. However, it has been reported that the ECG recorded at higher intercostal space is more sensitive and useful for diagnosis of Brugada syndrome than that recorded at the standard position. [14][15][16][17][18][19] In the present study, to avoid the risk of drug-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias on drug testing, we analyzed baseline ECG parameters recorded at the standard position and the third intercostal space in individuals with SB-ECG, and evaluated predictors of PR on drug provocation testing.
MethodsIn a total of 62 consecutive individuals with SB-ECG, we performed the drug provocation test using pilsicainide, a class Ic pure Na channel blocker, between September 2002 and December 2007. In these individuals, SB-ECG in leads V1 and V2 was exhibited in 4 and 58 individuals, respectively. In this study, we enrolled 58 individuals (55 males, mean age 51±11 years) with SB-ECG in lead V2. Of the 58 individuals, 48 individuals showed SB-ECG in lead V2 at the third intercostals space (V2IC3). The remaining 10 individuals did not show type 1 ECG in lead V2IC3. Patients who had exhibited a diagnostic ECG (type 1 ECG) at any
Conclusions:In individuals with SB-ECG, DR20 and DR20-STb in leads V2 and V2IC3 might be useful