Today, rotational thrombelastography as a further development
of the classical thrombelastography is increasingly
applied to assess haemostasis and to predict complications
of coagulation. Due to the improved robustness
of the method, RoTEM analyses are now also performed
outside specialised coagulation laboratories and
applied in emergency settings. Since coagulation testing,
particularly when performed with different activators, is
very sensitive to artifacts due to variations in the proportion
to anticoagulants, temperature and concentration of
activators, meticulous quality control is indispensable.
For this reason, the German Federal Chamber of Physicians
has issued rigorous validity ranges for the classic
coagulation tests, such as the prothrombin time (PT/INR)
or the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) for
variation coefficient acceptance, which are audited 4
times a year by external quality control circles. At present,
no comparable quality assurance setup exists for
whole blood coagulation testing. Thus, knowledge of the
analytical limits, restrictions and caveats of this method
is central for critical interpretation of the results and reliable
clinical application. This review gives an outline of
the practicability and accuracy of the RoTEM methodology
and illustrates some pitfalls for the use in detecting
and predicting disturbances of haemostasis in a case
report.