2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-003-0747-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different glial response to methamphetamine- and methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity

Abstract: The consequences of the neurotoxic insult induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, an amphetamine derivative with specific action on the serotonergic system) were compared with those of methamphetamine (a derivative with specific action on dopaminergic system) in rats. Both drugs induced a very similar loss of body weight, especially evident 24 h after treatment. Their hyperthermic profile was also very similar and was dependent on ambient temperature, corroborating the thermo-dysregulatory effect o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
118
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously reported failure to detect a loss of SERT protein in Western blot analyses is not the sole reason why some have questioned the 5-HT neurotoxic potential of substituted amphetamines. In particular, the fact that MDMA and structurally related drugs (PCA, FEN) do not typically produce signs of glial activation in the context of selective 5-HT deficits (Rowland et al, 1993;O'Callaghan and Miller, 1994;Pubill et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004Wang et al, , 2005Rothman et al, 2004;Thomas et al, 2004; but see Wilson et al, 1993;Aguirre et al, 1999;Orio et al, 2004) has led some of these investigators to reconsider the notion that substituted amphetamines produce neurotoxic effects. When considering these data, however, it is important to bear in mind that the effects of established 5-HT neurotoxins (5,7-DHT and 5,6-DHT) on glial responses have also been largely negative, particularly in brain regions removed from the site of intracerebral toxin injection (Stagaard et al, 1987;Hardin et al, 1994;Rowland et al, 1993;Bendotti et al, 1994;Dugar et al, 1998; but see Frankfurt et al, 1991;Dugar et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously reported failure to detect a loss of SERT protein in Western blot analyses is not the sole reason why some have questioned the 5-HT neurotoxic potential of substituted amphetamines. In particular, the fact that MDMA and structurally related drugs (PCA, FEN) do not typically produce signs of glial activation in the context of selective 5-HT deficits (Rowland et al, 1993;O'Callaghan and Miller, 1994;Pubill et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004Wang et al, , 2005Rothman et al, 2004;Thomas et al, 2004; but see Wilson et al, 1993;Aguirre et al, 1999;Orio et al, 2004) has led some of these investigators to reconsider the notion that substituted amphetamines produce neurotoxic effects. When considering these data, however, it is important to bear in mind that the effects of established 5-HT neurotoxins (5,7-DHT and 5,6-DHT) on glial responses have also been largely negative, particularly in brain regions removed from the site of intracerebral toxin injection (Stagaard et al, 1987;Hardin et al, 1994;Rowland et al, 1993;Bendotti et al, 1994;Dugar et al, 1998; but see Frankfurt et al, 1991;Dugar et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 H]PK11195 Binding A separate group of rats (n = 18) was used to study [ 3 H]PK11195 binding following a method reported previously (Pubill et al, 2003). We studied controls (n = 4), and ROI-c2 correspond to the homologous contralateral region of infarction and periphery, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Brain Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer markers, including Fluoro-Jade staining (Schmued and Bowyer, 1997, as well as microglial activation (Thomas et al, 2004, Thomas andKuhn, 2005), increased density of peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and increased expression of heat shock protein 27 (both markers of gliosis) (Pubill et al, 2003), are also in support of METH-induced neurotoxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, MDMA appears to be relatively ineffective in producing reactive gliosis, as indicated by a lack of a pronounced increase in expression or immunoreactivity of GFAP , Pubill et al, 2003, Wang et al, 2004b, although in a single exception, Aguirre and colleagues report an increase in GFAP immunoreactivity in the hippocampus 7 days after MDMA administration (Aguirre et al, 1999). MDMA also does not produce an appreciable increase in the expression of heat shock protein 27, particularly when compared to responses evoked by METH (Pubill et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%