2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different goals, different pathways to success: Performance-approach goals as direct and mastery-approach goals as indirect predictors of grades in mathematics

Abstract: In this study, we aimed to investigate the different routes through which perceived goal structures, and in turn mastery-approach and performance-approach goals in mathematics, predict subsequent academic performance. Path analyses with a sample of Turkish adolescents (N = 369; 49.1% males; M age = 16.67 years, SD = 1.85) revealed two distinct paths. After controlling for midyear grades, we found perceived mastery goal structures to relate (positively) to mastery-approach goals, which in turn positively predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
50
3
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(97 reference statements)
4
50
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For Exam 1, in which we had no indicator of previous performance, age and performance‐approach goals were significant positive predictors of score, and performance‐avoidance goals was a significant negative predictor. This replicates much of the existing achievement goal literature that shows performance goals more directly predict scores on exams in post‐secondary settings than mastery goals (e.g., Bipp & van Dam, ; Hulleman et al, ; Mouratidis, Michou, Demircioğlu, & Sayil, ) and highlights the adaptive nature of performance‐approach goals for achievement scores in a normative college setting. It is possible that these effects did not emerge for later exams because students' achievement goals became further removed from Exams 2 and 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For Exam 1, in which we had no indicator of previous performance, age and performance‐approach goals were significant positive predictors of score, and performance‐avoidance goals was a significant negative predictor. This replicates much of the existing achievement goal literature that shows performance goals more directly predict scores on exams in post‐secondary settings than mastery goals (e.g., Bipp & van Dam, ; Hulleman et al, ; Mouratidis, Michou, Demircioğlu, & Sayil, ) and highlights the adaptive nature of performance‐approach goals for achievement scores in a normative college setting. It is possible that these effects did not emerge for later exams because students' achievement goals became further removed from Exams 2 and 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This finding corroborates previous studies (Wormington & Linnenbrink‐Garcia, ). It also represents a positive finding because MAp goal orientations have been linked to high competence expectancies, motivation, and performance (Belenky & Nokes‐Malach, ; Darnon et al, ; Gaudreau, ; Mouratidis et al, ; Ranellucci et al, ; Senko & Hulleman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to individuals who have mastery goals, individuals who have a PAp goal orientation seek positive judgments of competence and will often try to outperform others: “My goal in this class is to get a better grade than most of the other students” (A. J. Elliot & McGregor, , p. 504). This goal orientation has been linked to high academic performance (Darnon, Butera, Mugny, Quiamzade, & Hulleman, ; Darnon, Harackiewicz, Butera, Mugny, & Quiamzade, ; Darnon et al, ; Harackiewicz et al, ; Mouratidis et al, ), but research has also linked it with a low use of learning strategies, depleted working memory, and self‐handicapping tendencies (Avery & Smillie, ; Crouzevialle & Butera, ; Fisher & Ford, ; Midgley, Kaplan, & Middleton, ). Individuals who demonstrate a PAv goal orientation focus on avoiding negative judgments of competence and may ascribe to the following goal: “My goal is to avoid doing poorly in this class” (A. J. Elliot & Church, , p. 223).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations