2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different irrigation methods and water stress effects on potato yield and yield components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
150
4
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
48
150
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The tuber number per plant increased from 5.5 to 7.3 in 2003, and from 5.6 to 6.5 in 2005. Similarity, Onder et al (2005) reported that the number of tuber per plant was not significantly affected by irrigation methods. The highest values of tuber weight were recorded for the drip irrigation treatment.…”
Section: Tuber Yield and Yield Componentssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The tuber number per plant increased from 5.5 to 7.3 in 2003, and from 5.6 to 6.5 in 2005. Similarity, Onder et al (2005) reported that the number of tuber per plant was not significantly affected by irrigation methods. The highest values of tuber weight were recorded for the drip irrigation treatment.…”
Section: Tuber Yield and Yield Componentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…While no differences were registered in 2003 (P > 0.05) irrigation regimens affected tuber yield (P < 0.05) in 2005, and the highest tuber yield was obtained in the 30% irrigation regimen -35.13 t ha -1 in 2003, and 44.56 t ha -1 in 2005. The highest tuber yield was registered for the drip-irrigated treatment, watered Faberio et al (2001), in Spain, found that 597 mm irrigation water was required to reach maximum tuber yield 45.18 t ha -1 ; Onder et al (2005) determined that surface drip irrigation and subsurface drip irrigation methods did not significantly affect tuber yield under Turkey soil/climate conditions. Other researchers have also reported increased tuber yield with irrigation applications (Shock et al, 1998;Ferreira & Carr, 2002;Kashyap & Panda, 2003;Yuan et al, 2003;Kang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Tuber Yield and Yield Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations