2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Lifestyle Interventions in Adults From Underserved Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the residual beneficial effect in the intervention group vs. the control group was negligible at 4-year follow-up. 34 FAMILIA, the Grenada Heart Project and the Look AHEAD trial, 29 , 30 , 35 among others, are recent large-sized lifestyle intervention trials that have failed to demonstrate a benefit of different lifestyle interventions in either participants, or patients with Type 2 diabetes, thus illustrating the difficulty to obtain significant and sustained lifestyle changes through coaching in adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the residual beneficial effect in the intervention group vs. the control group was negligible at 4-year follow-up. 34 FAMILIA, the Grenada Heart Project and the Look AHEAD trial, 29 , 30 , 35 among others, are recent large-sized lifestyle intervention trials that have failed to demonstrate a benefit of different lifestyle interventions in either participants, or patients with Type 2 diabetes, thus illustrating the difficulty to obtain significant and sustained lifestyle changes through coaching in adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 , 28 Moreover, this tool has been used to assess outcomes after lifestyle interventions across diverse populations such as parents or caregivers of children from a socioeconomically disadvantaged community in the New York City, or low–middle-income individuals from the island of Grenada. 26 , 29 , 30 For the current TANSNIP-PESA study, an adapted version of the original Fuster-BEWAT score was pre-established as the primary outcome. 21 The reasons to adapt the original score were to enable the detection of relevant changes in the PESA cohort (a homogeneous physically active population with overall low–intermediate CVD risk 20 ) and to incorporate sedentary time, which is one of the three target behaviours of the TANSNIP-PESA intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Igualmente, se deben poner a disposición los recursos necesarios, aprovechando aquellos que sean propios de las empresas para reducir costes, así como la proximidad de la intervención a los puestos de trabajo, permitiendo que los empleados se involucren más en la misma. Como se ha visto en esta intervención, así como en otras previas, la motivación y la adherencia al programa están asociadas a una mayor consecución de los objetivos planteados (13,27) . Otro aspecto clave es la designación de un coordinador en la empresa, que puede ser el responsable del servicio de prevención de riesgos laborales, aprovechando la estructura y organización de las actividades de promoción de la salud en las empresas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…61,64 Among health education interventions, those with multiple sessions demonstrated better results compared with a single-session intervention. 63,72,73,85,86 Although individual variation certainly exists, there appears to be a minimum intervention intensity required to achieve a change in CVH.…”
Section: Outcomes Related To Child and Adult Cvhmentioning
confidence: 99%