2022
DOI: 10.4312/dp.49.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different manifestations of Neolithization in Northwest Anatolia?

Abstract: The Neolithic way of life was first established in Northwest Anatolia before the middle of the 7th millennium BC. The recently excavated sites of Barcın Hoyuk and Bahcelievler have yielded archaeological evidence for the earliest Neolithic levels in the region and provide new archaeobotanical datasets. To compare different adaptations to the changes brought on by the Neolithization processes, we studied 348 archaeobotanical samples from Phases VIe and VId1 at Barcın and 63 samples from the contemporaneous leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In NW Anatolian Barcın, both architecture and subsistence data indicate close sociocultural connections to C Anatolia, with little indication of Mesolithic sociocultural presence (Gerritsen & Özbal, 2019) (Figure 4). Meanwhile, in other NW Anatolian sites such as Aktopraklık, Bahçelievler and Pendik, semisubterranean round huts have been considered an indication of Mesolithic influence, and the subsistence patterns of Pendik and neighbouring villages (the “Fikirtepe culture”) interpreted as an amalgamation of Mesolithic and C Anatolian Neolithic traditions (Balcı et al, 2022; Karul, 2017; M. Özdoğan, 2014, 2024).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In NW Anatolian Barcın, both architecture and subsistence data indicate close sociocultural connections to C Anatolia, with little indication of Mesolithic sociocultural presence (Gerritsen & Özbal, 2019) (Figure 4). Meanwhile, in other NW Anatolian sites such as Aktopraklık, Bahçelievler and Pendik, semisubterranean round huts have been considered an indication of Mesolithic influence, and the subsistence patterns of Pendik and neighbouring villages (the “Fikirtepe culture”) interpreted as an amalgamation of Mesolithic and C Anatolian Neolithic traditions (Balcı et al, 2022; Karul, 2017; M. Özdoğan, 2014, 2024).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 4). Meanwhile, in other NW Anatolian sites such as Aktopraklık, Bahçelievler and Pendik, semisubterranean round huts have been considered an indication of Mesolithic influence, and the subsistence patterns of Pendik and neighbouring villages (the "Fikirtepe culture") interpreted as an amalgamation of Mesolithic and C Anatolian Neolithic traditions (Balcı et al, 2022;Karul, 2017;M. Özdoğan, 2014.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Materials Culture Uncoupled From Demographi...mentioning
confidence: 99%