2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1802-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different materials for direct pulp capping: systematic review and meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Abstract: To reduce risk of failure, dentists might consider using MTA instead of calcium hydroxide (CH) for direct capping. Current evidence is insufficient for definitive recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
83
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…, Schwendicke et al . 2016b), and only few included studies evaluated the long‐term clinical success of deep carious lesions treatment. Thus, long‐term RCT are needed to confirm whether the clinical success achieved with the two materials remains similar over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Schwendicke et al . 2016b), and only few included studies evaluated the long‐term clinical success of deep carious lesions treatment. Thus, long‐term RCT are needed to confirm whether the clinical success achieved with the two materials remains similar over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, no high level, scientific‐based recommendation can be made for selecting a ‘gold standard’ capping material (Schwendicke et al . ).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, the quest to find an ideal pulp capping agent has led to other biomaterials being suggested in the literature, such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), dental bonding agents, formocresol, ferric sulfate, and materials derived from MTA, such as calcium silicate, calcium phosphate and calcium aluminate-based cements. [5][6][7][8][9] An ideal pulp capping material should adhere to tooth substrate; maintain a sufficient seal, be insoluble in tissue fluids; dimensionally stable, non-resorbable, nontoxic, noncarcinogenic, nongenotoxic, radiopaque, and exhibit biocompatibility and bioactivity. 6,10,11 Unfortunately, none of the biomaterials currently available have been able to satisfy all the requirements of an ideal VPT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%