2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different mechanisms of protein immobilization on glutaraldehyde activated supports: Effect of support activation and immobilization conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
256
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
256
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the support modification with APTS and glutaraldehyde facilitated the rapid binding of the enzyme by covalent interactions between the aldehyde group of glutaraldehyde and the amine groups of the enzyme. A high concentration of aldehyde groups on the support surface may cause many multi-point covalent enzyme-support bonds, so as to obtain rigidity in the structure of the enzyme, favoring a high stability and a high intrinsic activity of the derivative (Betancor, et al, 2006). Hu et al (2009) reported that Serratia marcescens lipase was almost fully immobilized onto aldehydefuncionalized-APTES magnetic nanoparticles within 10 min.…”
Section: Effect Of the Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the support modification with APTS and glutaraldehyde facilitated the rapid binding of the enzyme by covalent interactions between the aldehyde group of glutaraldehyde and the amine groups of the enzyme. A high concentration of aldehyde groups on the support surface may cause many multi-point covalent enzyme-support bonds, so as to obtain rigidity in the structure of the enzyme, favoring a high stability and a high intrinsic activity of the derivative (Betancor, et al, 2006). Hu et al (2009) reported that Serratia marcescens lipase was almost fully immobilized onto aldehydefuncionalized-APTES magnetic nanoparticles within 10 min.…”
Section: Effect Of the Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dimer GLD form enables fast protein immobilization as compared to its monomer counterpart. 104 In a low ionic medium, immobilization proceeds via ionic exchange with the amino groups on the support followed by the covalent attachment. In a high ionic medium, the biomolecule is directly immobilized by covalent bonding with slower immobilization kinetics.…”
Section: Covalentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incubation of the immobilized enzymes at pH 7 or 9 after 24 h in 500 mM NaCl/25 mM sodium phosphate produced the full release of the enzyme immobilized on MANAE-agarose [37,38], but all enzyme molecules remained immobilized on the glutaraldehyde preparations, showing the success of getting a covalent immobilization. Finally, we tried to get the direct covalent immobilization of the enzyme on the support [19,22]. In this case, the immobilization will proceed by the most reactive primary amino group, and the main effect of the pH is to control the protein reactivity, which should increase using a higher pH value, but at pH over 8 this effect is detrimental for the glutaraldehyde groups stability [24].…”
Section: Immobilization Of β-Gal On Glutaraldehyde Pre-activated Suppmentioning
confidence: 99%