2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different methods of measuring synergy between cavitation erosion and corrosion for nickel aluminium bronze in 3.5% NaCl solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such impacts are a result of acceleration due to cavitation implosion (not noticed in pure cavitation and pure abrasion conditions). The findings are in good agreement with the observations from other investigations [51][52][53]. The positive synergistic effects contribute to a comprehensive removal of the surface asperities, resulting in a smooth and uniform surface finish.…”
Section: Synergistic Effects Of Combined Wear Mechanisms In Materials...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such impacts are a result of acceleration due to cavitation implosion (not noticed in pure cavitation and pure abrasion conditions). The findings are in good agreement with the observations from other investigations [51][52][53]. The positive synergistic effects contribute to a comprehensive removal of the surface asperities, resulting in a smooth and uniform surface finish.…”
Section: Synergistic Effects Of Combined Wear Mechanisms In Materials...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Polarization method and electrochemical impedance spectrometry (EIS) are the two most common electrochemical methods in the corrosion studies. These two methods have been widely used to quantify the effect of cavitation erosion on corrosion and vice versa [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] . However, insensitivity to high-speed short-time changes on the surface, makes these two methods not suitable for the study of cavitation damage under single bubble collapse which occurs in microsecond time-scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mn–Cu alloy was once regarded as an ideal material for propeller damping, shock absorption, and noise reduction due to its excellent damping and mechanical properties [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]; however, due to its severe shrinkage porosity and poor stress corrosion and corrosion fatigue resistance, Mn–Cu alloy still faces challenges for application in the field of propeller manufacturing [ 12 , 14 ]. Current marine propeller materials are still mainly nickel–aluminum bronze (NAB) and composite materials [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]; Mn–Cu damping alloys have not been widely used. In order to solve the above problems, researchers used traditional sintering [ 22 ] or cumulative rolling [ 23 ] methods to prepare gradient composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%