2018
DOI: 10.31768/2312-8852.2018.40(3):228-234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Morphological Structures of Breast Tumors Demonstrate Individual Drug Resistance Gene Expression Profiles

Abstract: Aim: To identify gene expression profiles involved in drug resistance of different morphological structures (tubular, alveolar, solid, trabecular, and discrete) presented in breast cancer. Material and Methods: Ten patients with luminal breast cancer have been included. A laser microdissection-assisted microarrays and qRT-PCR were used to perform whole-transcriptome profiling of different morphological structures, to select differentially expressed drug response genes, and to validate their expression. Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We postulate here that ASA and RGYR may provide prospective metrics for assessing the potential of tumor organoids to be exposed and penetrated by the drug. Some recent studies have discussed the relationship between morphologies of in vivo and ex vivo tumors and their response to drugs [67, 68] showing that there is an interest in developing new measures to assess drug efficacy in tumors and tumor organoids based on their morphology. The organoids considered here (up to 150 μm in radius) are of the size that is below the diffusivity limits of oxygen or nutrients (200–250 μm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We postulate here that ASA and RGYR may provide prospective metrics for assessing the potential of tumor organoids to be exposed and penetrated by the drug. Some recent studies have discussed the relationship between morphologies of in vivo and ex vivo tumors and their response to drugs [67, 68] showing that there is an interest in developing new measures to assess drug efficacy in tumors and tumor organoids based on their morphology. The organoids considered here (up to 150 μm in radius) are of the size that is below the diffusivity limits of oxygen or nutrients (200–250 μm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABCG2 gene (located on chromosome 4q22.1) which encodes breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) has an important role in resistance to mitoxantrone, methotrexate (MTX), cladribine, and topotecan (1). ABCG1 gene (located on chromosome 21q22.3) also known as ABC8 or WHITE1 (17) can make resistance to doxorubicin (18). Still published reports about multidrug resistance by ABCG1 in pediatric malignancies are rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the cohort screened is accessible to other investigators and amenable to replication or expansion of this work. Other studies have examined NAT1 expression in breast cancer using qRT-PCR [22,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], transcriptomics [19], proteomics, metabolomics or immunochemistry [23,[38][39][40][41]. Collectively, there is agreement that NAT1 is overexpressed in hormone receptor positive breast tumors, while more elaborate associations have also been proposed, namely, with relation to chemotherapy resistance [23] and better prognosis of tamoxifen treatment [22,34,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%