2002
DOI: 10.1080/000164702320155347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different patterns of cartilage wear in medial and lateral gonarthrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the qualitative observations made by Harman et al 1 and Weidow et al 2,3 The CT study of Vande Berg et al 8 also showed that lateral compartment cartilage lesions occur more posteriorly on the tibia than those on the medial compartment. Although the difference in site of the lesion midpoint in medial and lateral OA is small on the tibial side (5 mm on average), it is substantial on the femoral side (15 mm on average).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This agrees with the qualitative observations made by Harman et al 1 and Weidow et al 2,3 The CT study of Vande Berg et al 8 also showed that lateral compartment cartilage lesions occur more posteriorly on the tibia than those on the medial compartment. Although the difference in site of the lesion midpoint in medial and lateral OA is small on the tibial side (5 mm on average), it is substantial on the femoral side (15 mm on average).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This view is, however, not routinely used in Sweden. It might have added further information to our study and especially in lateral arthrosis, where the most pronounced wear is localized posteriorly (Weidow et al 2002). There are several possible reasons for why the semi-flexed position is superior to full extension in the diagnosis of arthrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The increased scatter observed in lateral arthrosis may reflect the fact that weight-bearing on the most eroded part of the joint is difficult to achieve. In these cases, maximum wear is often located posteriorly on both the tibia and the femur (Harman et al 1998, Weidow et al 2002. Flexion to 20-30 degrees is often not sufficient to reach this part of the joint, resulting in a more pronounced underestimation of the true progression of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more posterior contact of the lateral femoral condyle might also explain posterior cartilage wear in lateral OA. 28 The relative tibiofemoral rotations throughout flexion-extension in OA knees are not completely known. In a previous radiostereometric evaluation, Saari and colleagues 29 studied knee kinematics during active extension and weight bearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%