1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf03017959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different properties of the bradycardia produced by neostigmine and edrophonium in the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we have demonstrated, in the cat, that the range of dose ofedrophonium which blocks the bradycardia produced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve 4 overlaps that which blocks cholinesterase activity. 13 In a previous study in bilaterally vagotomized, propranolol-treated cats, we reported that edrophonium at a dose < 1.5 mg.kg -1 augmented the bradycardia evoked by electrical stimulation of the distal sectioned portion of the vagus nerve, presumably secondary to the facilitation of transmission in the cardiac parasympathetic pathway due to the anticholinesterase action of edrophonium. 4,1s However, at doses > 1.5 mg.kg -1, edrophonium blocked the bradycardia evoked by stimulation of the vagus nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In fact, we have demonstrated, in the cat, that the range of dose ofedrophonium which blocks the bradycardia produced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve 4 overlaps that which blocks cholinesterase activity. 13 In a previous study in bilaterally vagotomized, propranolol-treated cats, we reported that edrophonium at a dose < 1.5 mg.kg -1 augmented the bradycardia evoked by electrical stimulation of the distal sectioned portion of the vagus nerve, presumably secondary to the facilitation of transmission in the cardiac parasympathetic pathway due to the anticholinesterase action of edrophonium. 4,1s However, at doses > 1.5 mg.kg -1, edrophonium blocked the bradycardia evoked by stimulation of the vagus nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, this possibility seems unlikely because of the finding in a previous study that with edrophonium, there is a close correlation between the magnitude of the inhibition of erythrocyte cholinesterase activi~ and bradycardia suggesting that cholinesterase activity in the heart is inhibited by doses of anticholinesterase which are similar to those required to inhibit red cell cholinesterase. 4 The similarity between the properties of the bradycardia produced by pyridostigmine and physostigmine and those of the bradycardia evoked by neostigmin e suggest that the bradycardia produced by anticholinesterases containing a carbamyl group is mediated by similar mechanisms. Previously, we have hypothesised that the bradycardia produced by neostigmine is caused by direct activation of cholinergic receptors in the peripheral cardiac parasympathetic pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are reminiscent both qualitatively and quantitatively of the findings observed with neostigmine, s,4 The bradycardia produced by edrophonium, in contrast, demonstrates similar sensi-tivity to block by muscarinic M 2 antagonists compared to that produced by vagus nerve stimulation and is insensitive to block by nicotinic receptor antagonists. 3,4 Because the anticholinesterases were administered as bolus doses, rather than by continuous infusion, steadystate drug levels were not achieved. Nevertheless, since the objective was to correlate two biological end-points, namely the reduction in heart rate and inhibition of cholinesterase activity, the actual drug levels were irrelevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recent studies suggest that anticholinesterases may have additional effects at cholinergic synapses within the autonomic peripheral pathway. For example, in vivo and in vitro animal studies suggest that neostigmine and edrophonium directly activate (Backman et al, 1993a(Backman et al, , 1996a and inhibit (Backman et al, 1997;Stein et al, 1998), respectively, these cholinergic receptors. Thus, the parasympathomimetic action of the anticholinesterases must be understood within the context of their anticholinesterase activity on the one hand, and their direct interaction with cholinergic receptors on the other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%