2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2020.2980299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Set Domain Adaptation for Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Label Alignment Approach

Abstract: A brain-computer interface (BCI) system usually needs a long calibration session for each new subject/task to adjust its parameters, which impedes its transition from the laboratory to real-world applications. Domain adaptation, which leverages labeled data from auxiliary subjects/tasks (source domains), has demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing such calibration effort. Currently, most domain adaptation approaches require the source domains to have the same feature space and label space as the target doma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are currently exploring extensions of HTNet for a variety of applications such as cross-frequency coupling [94, 95], long-term state decoding [6], cross-task decoding [96], and data-driven regression [97, 98]. In addition, other decoding measures could be substituted for the Hilbert transform, including non-Fourier methods [99, 100], and more complex interpolation schemes could be used to generate the projection matrix by incorporating participant-specific cortical anatomy [101, 102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are currently exploring extensions of HTNet for a variety of applications such as cross-frequency coupling [94, 95], long-term state decoding [6], cross-task decoding [96], and data-driven regression [97, 98]. In addition, other decoding measures could be substituted for the Hilbert transform, including non-Fourier methods [99, 100], and more complex interpolation schemes could be used to generate the projection matrix by incorporating participant-specific cortical anatomy [101, 102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a reference matrix is crucial because it defines the center of all single-trial EEG signals from the same subject. Data alignment can be conducted in Riemannian space (RA) [23] or Euclidean space (EA) [24]. In the study, we propose a hybrid Riemannian and Euclidean space data alignment (REA) method.…”
Section: B Data Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Data alignment in Euclidean space: EA employs Euclidean mean of covariance matrices from all EEG signals in task periods as a reference matrix, in which the subject conducts mental tasks of motor imagery. The reference matrix of a subject is strictly equivalent to an identity matrix [24]. Different from RA, EA aligns EEG trials instead of covariance matrices because in Euclidean space, classification is based on spatially filtered EEG trials.…”
Section: B Data Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations