2001
DOI: 10.1007/s003740100406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different sources of heavy metals and their long-term effects on soil microbial properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
62
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings also agree with those of Vance (1996) and Chander et al (2001). The former found that the changes in MBC were correlated with the granulometry of the WA added to soil, and that the addition of fine WA granulometry immediately affected the system.…”
Section: Microbiological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings also agree with those of Vance (1996) and Chander et al (2001). The former found that the changes in MBC were correlated with the granulometry of the WA added to soil, and that the addition of fine WA granulometry immediately affected the system.…”
Section: Microbiological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In such a state, this element is unavailable for plants. Mineralisation of sulfur may be carried out by microorganisms, and therefore their role in the sulfur cycle is very important [16,17].…”
Section: Resistance Of Arylsulfatase To Contamination Of Soil By Heavmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trace elements contaminating the soil inhibit the activity of microorganisms living in it, thereby contributing to a reduction in their vital functionsdecomposition and transformation of organic substances (Becker et al 2006, Hander et al 2012, OciepaKubicka and Ociepa 2012. The limited microbial activity in the rhizosphere has a negative effect on plants, inhibiting their normal growth and adversely affecting their resistance (Meers et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%