2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different subsets of primary chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells engraft immunodeficient mice and produce a model of the human disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
97
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion that basophils express substantial amounts of CD26 on their surface suggests that these cells may also be involved in SDF‐1 degradation and in the related migratory defect of CML LSC against this cytokine. Indeed, normal and CML stem cells express CXCR4, the receptor for SDF‐1; and disruption of SDF‐1 activity is considered to lead to stem cell mobilization 71, 72, 76, 77, 78. In this regard, it is worth noting that in patients with severe allergies where basophils may also increase, the numbers of circulating colony‐forming progenitor cells also increase 79.…”
Section: Possible Role Of Basophils In Modulating Stem Cell‐niche Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that basophils express substantial amounts of CD26 on their surface suggests that these cells may also be involved in SDF‐1 degradation and in the related migratory defect of CML LSC against this cytokine. Indeed, normal and CML stem cells express CXCR4, the receptor for SDF‐1; and disruption of SDF‐1 activity is considered to lead to stem cell mobilization 71, 72, 76, 77, 78. In this regard, it is worth noting that in patients with severe allergies where basophils may also increase, the numbers of circulating colony‐forming progenitor cells also increase 79.…”
Section: Possible Role Of Basophils In Modulating Stem Cell‐niche Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 What was not appreciated at the time was the co-mobilization of high numbers of primitive leukemic cells into the blood of such patients. [11][12][13] However, continued cytogenetic follow-up of CML patients' cells showed that the oncogenic process in this disease is indeed one of clonal evolution. As discussed below, we now understand that this process is derivative of an acquired genomic instability that leads to the continuous acquisition of new genetic alterations and an accompanying selection of growthadvantaged subclones, the properties of which may differentially affect treatment response, as well as disease progression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pas sûr, mais pas facile ! Les arguments initiaux en faveur de la réalité de CSC proviennent de l'analyse de certaines leucémies myéloïdes [2,3], où une petite sous-population (< 0,001%) de cellules, de phénotype CD34 + /CD38 -(un phénotype que partagent aussi les CS hématopoïétiques normales), est seule capable de générer les populations postmitotiques cancéreuses après injection à des souris immunodéficientes NOD-SCID, alors que le reste des cellules leucémi-ques en est incapable ; des arguments convaincants ont aussi été obtenus dans quelques tumeurs solides, notamment les glioblastomes et dans ce cas, les CSC se distinguent par l'expression de l'antigène CD133 [4]. À partir de ces expériences pionnières, le concept de cellules souches cancéreuses s'est propagé comme une traînée de poudre sans toutefois être toujours validé expérimentalement de façon rigoureuse, ce qui est plus difficile dans les cancers solides que dans les hémopathies, les cellules leucémiques étant facilement accessibles dans le sang ou la moelle osseuse, et la hiérarchie hématopoïétique solidement établie.…”
Section: Le Dogme Des Cellules Souches Cancéreusesunclassified