2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different substitutions lead to differences in the transport and recombination properties of group V doped SiCNTs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, although the SiCNT model is sp 2 bonding configuration during modeling, there are both sp 2 bonding configuration and sp 3 bonding configuration after optimization, which is consistent with the experimental results. [22] The stability of doped SiCNT structure can be evaluated by the binding energy (or cohesive energy), [36] which is expressed as…”
Section: Structural Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, although the SiCNT model is sp 2 bonding configuration during modeling, there are both sp 2 bonding configuration and sp 3 bonding configuration after optimization, which is consistent with the experimental results. [22] The stability of doped SiCNT structure can be evaluated by the binding energy (or cohesive energy), [36] which is expressed as…”
Section: Structural Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where group-V element substitutes for C atom, the conductivity of As C -SiCNT is the smallest because of its lowest impurity concentration and smallest carrier concentration. [36] Similarly, in the case where group-V element replaces Si atom, because the carrier concentration is the lowest, the conductivity of N Si -SiCNT is also the smallest.…”
Section: Optical Absorption and Photo-induced Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, large transmittance modulation means a large number of ions inside the electrochromic materials which is to some extent opposite to the short response time. It can also be reasonably explained when considering doping in electrochromic materials: shallow doping provides a large number of carriers to accommodate ions (large transmittance modulation) but reduces the recombination rate (long response time); deep doping shows the opposite [ 19 ]. In addition, the short response time is more related to loose structured electrochromic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%